Re: [racket] PLoT - is there a way to have a non-numeric, categorical x-axis (and possibly display histograms)?

2011-07-22 Thread Doug Williams
Let me know if there is anything I can help you with. On Friday, July 22, 2011, keyd...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi Doug, > > thanks for the pointer! I didn't know the science collection before, but now I see there's lots of interesting stuff in it for me! > And I certainly will have a look at the code r

Re: [racket] PLoT - is there a way to have a non-numeric, categorical x-axis (and possibly display histograms)?

2011-07-22 Thread keyd...@gmx.de
Hi Doug, thanks for the pointer! I didn't know the science collection before, but now I see there's lots of interesting stuff in it for me! And I certainly will have a look at the code regarding the extension of PLoT (and some other things, too :-) ) Ciao, Sigrid Am 22.07.2011 um 19:05 schr

Re: [racket] PLoT - is there a way to have a non-numeric, categorical x-axis (and possibly display histograms)?

2011-07-22 Thread Doug Williams
The science collection has histograms and extensions to the PLoT package for them. The x-axis is numeric. But, you can look at the code and see how to extend the PLoT package plots. Doug On Friday, July 22, 2011, keyd...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to know if using PLoT, there is any way to

[racket] PLoT - is there a way to have a non-numeric, categorical x-axis (and possibly display histograms)?

2011-07-22 Thread keyd...@gmx.de
Hi, I'd like to know if using PLoT, there is any way to have the x-axis values being categories (like e.g., weekdays...), and having the x-axis labeled accordingly? Ideally, it's histograms I'd like to show, but I assume this is not possible, or is it somehow? Many thanks for your help, Sigri

Re: [racket] FFI question: problem passing a cstruct to a function for output

2011-07-22 Thread keyd...@gmx.de
Hi Thomas, many thanks for your reply! > > > the declaration of the wrapper function looks correct. For the ind_ptr > argument you could actually pass an array of booleans instead of some > structure, I might try this instead, and see if I get the same error ... But I find your arguments aga