At Fri, 1 Jul 2011 17:59:04 -0500, Don Blaheta wrote:
> I was just Scribble-ing and needed a (small) image, so I thought, hey
> this is DrRacket, I'll just paste it in. DrRacket can handle it, and
> the WXME format is readable by scribble, but I do get this message:
>
> regexp-match: non-characte
6 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> J G Cho wrote at 07/01/2011 03:27 PM:
> > Looking at net/cookie-unit.rkt, it's not obvious to me why "" are being
> > printed.
> >
>
> Looks like "cookie-path", for one, can add the quotes (indirectly;
> ultimately in "convert-to-quoted").
>
> Offhand, I co
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
You can see examples of using images in scribble examples in the
documentation for the `2htdp/image' teachpack:
https://github.com/plt/racket/blob/master/collects/teachpack/2htdp/scribblings/image.scrbl
and the results:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/teachpack/2htdpi
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Don Blaheta wrote:
>
> Quoth Matthias Felleisen:
>> You can use the image library to write images into the scribble output.
You can see examples of using images in scribble examples in the
documentation for the `2htdp/image' teachpack:
https://github.com/plt/rac
Huh. I was coming back to reply to my own post and say, "oh duh, of
course you can't do that", and I found Matthias's response:
Quoth Matthias Felleisen:
> You can use the image library to write images into the scribble output.
And now I'm intrigued. My "oh duh" was remembering that the output
> Looks like "cookie-path", for one, can add the quotes (indirectly;
> ultimately in "convert-to-quoted").
I read that part after sending this email inquiry. It does seem to
have some rules RFC rules about quoting string.
;; value: token | quoted-string
(define (rfc2109:value? s)
(or (rfc2068:
You can use the image library to write images into the scribble output.
On Jul 1, 2011, at 6:59 PM, Don Blaheta wrote:
> I was just Scribble-ing and needed a (small) image, so I thought, hey
> this is DrRacket, I'll just paste it in. DrRacket can handle it, and
> the WXME format is readable b
I was just Scribble-ing and needed a (small) image, so I thought, hey
this is DrRacket, I'll just paste it in. DrRacket can handle it, and
the WXME format is readable by scribble, but I do get this message:
regexp-match: non-character in an unsupported context, from port:
#
which seems like mor
J G Cho wrote at 07/01/2011 03:27 PM:
Looking at net/cookie-unit.rkt, it's not obvious to me why "" are being printed.
Looks like "cookie-path", for one, can add the quotes (indirectly;
ultimately in "convert-to-quoted").
Offhand, I could not tell you with certainty what the correct behav
(map (λ (item)
(display (header-field item))
(display " ")
(display (header-value item))
(newline)
item)
(list (cookie->header (make-cookie "id" "joseph" #:max-age 500
#:path "/"
outputs:
Set-Cookie id=joseph; Max-Age=500; Path="/"; Version=1
I thin
8 minutes ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> > I tried:
> >
> > #lang slideshow
> >
> > @slide[
> > @t{Blah blah}]
>
> Try:
>
> ;;;
> #lang at-exp slideshow
> @slide[@t{Blah blah}]
> ;;;
>
I think you want to read the scribble documentation for the scribble
reader (which is where the @s come from: they are another notation for
sexps; @slide[stuff] is the same as (slide stuff), for example).
Robby
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> I tried:
>
> #lang slideshow
>
>
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> I tried:
>
> #lang slideshow
>
> @slide[
> @t{Blah blah}]
Try:
;;;
#lang at-exp slideshow
@slide[@t{Blah blah}]
;;;
The "@" feature is enabled by the use of the 'at-exp' in the
I tried:
#lang slideshow
@slide[
@t{Blah blah}]
but that gives me:
compile: unbound identifier in module in: @slide
Can you point me to the documentation for this syntax?
(@slide does not give any result in the Help desk search)
Thanks,
-- Éric
On Jul 1, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Eli Barzilay wro
At Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:55:38 -0500, John Riedl wrote:
> In any case, this is a usability fail. The two ways of making bitmaps
> should have the same defaults, even if their designers disagree on
> which is preferred :). To whom do I mention that?
Just to augment Robby's response, the two ways ex
15 matches
Mail list logo
