Hi Raoul,
> to what degree can one leverage typed racket for new languages in the
> racket ecosystem?
(You mean for *creating* new languages, right?) I'm actually in the
middle of doing this right now.
> tho i read that even if there are ways to use it, there be dragons in
> terms of getting t
You can write your own language on top of Typed Racket quite easily.
For example, in Matthias' recent post [1], if you change:
#lang racket
(define-syntax-rule
(count-forms mexpr ...)
(#%module-begin ---stuff---))
to
#lang racket
(require (prefix-in tr: typed/racket))
(define-syntax-rule
> May I propose a somewhat more modest but more useful concrete goal?
> It would be fantastic if we could create teaching languages via
> the composition of language fragments. Some could be mixins, some
> could be traits, some could be ... whatevers.
Quick-and-dirty prototype done and posted on P
Danny's proposal is not that abstract. I think with one change (his
"provide" in mixin-lang/mixin would need to be a new keyword) I could
implement his specification as written.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
>
> May I propose a somewhat more modest b
May I propose a somewhat more modest but more useful concrete goal?
It would be fantastic if we could create teaching languages via
the composition of language fragments. Some could be mixins, some
could be traits, some could be ... whatevers.
(1) This would be a concrete goal instead of som
I have a crazy proposal, and wanted to run it by and see if it made
any sense at all. The sketchy proposal is here:
http://hashcollision.org/mixin-lang/
The basic idea is that I would like to be able to mix-in languages
together, and make it stupidly simple to do so. From a hand-wavy look
a
hi,
to what degree can one leverage typed racket for new languages in the
racket ecosystem? tho i read that even if there are ways to use it,
there be dragons in terms of getting the new language just right wrt
type enforcement.
thanks.
_
For list
Calling All Racketeers!
This is the third announcement of RacketCon:
23 & 24 July 2011
http://con.racket-lang.org/
We will continue accepting presentation proposals for RacketCon through
*this weekend*. We hope to have a preliminary schedule out soon thereafter.
To obt
The `port-commit-peeked' function (used by `regexp-match-evt') was
deeply broken with respect to `file-position' and `port-next-location'.
I see no workaround for old versions, but the problem is now fixed in
the current development version (in the git repo).
At Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:19:03 -0700, Ma
In the development version (in the git repo), I've changed
`make-limited-input-port' to produce a port that supports progress
events when the given port supports progress events.
At Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:55:38 +0100, Milo Arvidsson wrote:
>
> I'm getting contract violations when I use 'make-limited
9 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> Ah, I see. Makes sense. Thanks.
[*sigh*... Meanwhile, I bit, and will do it anyway...]
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> >>
> >> This is not a good argument, if I'm understanding you correctly. I
Ah, I see. Makes sense. Thanks.
Robby
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>>
>> This is not a good argument, if I'm understanding you correctly. I
>> think you're saying "it is too annoying to give a good error
>> message" which is not a reaso
I believe you need to either rename your documentation file (to
anything that doesn't begin with "doc") or use a more recent version
of racket.
Robby
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> Hello! I just uploaded a version of the Simply Scheme definitions
> that should work under 5
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Veer wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> Choosing "No debugging or profiling" did the trick.
> I assume that this error(now gone) is not specific to my system.
It isn't specific to your system, but it might be hard to replicate.
However, I think it will go away in a refactori
Hello Sam,
Choosing "No debugging or profiling" did the trick.
I assume that this error(now gone) is not specific to my system.
Thanks!!! a lot.
Veer.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Try the following:
>
> 1. Open the "Choose Language" dialog, from the "Language
Try the following:
1. Open the "Choose Language" dialog, from the "Language" menu.
2. Click on "show details".
3. Then choose "No debugging or profiling", and maybe also uncheck the
"Populate compiled directories" box.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Veer wrote:
> Ok , problem is still there ,
Ok , problem is still there , I get the same error , on new ubuntu
system 11.04 and newly downloaded racket 5.1.1 .
Any other idea , on how to troubleshoot it ?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Veer wrote:
> Removing compiled directory also does not work , same error.
> I am upgrading my syste
17 matches
Mail list logo
