Earlier today, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> If someone came to you and said, "We're using PLT 4.2.5 with CGC and
> JIT, and we are wondering whether reliability would be improved by
> moving to Racket 5.x
Probably. Most releases include fixes to crashes... (And of course
there's no way to compare the
On 05/20/2011 10:00 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
If someone came to you and said, "We're using PLT 4.2.5 with CGC and
JIT, and we are wondering whether reliability would be improved by
moving to Racket 5.x and/or moving to 3m and/or disabling 4.2.5's
JIT," what would you say?
Details... A big instal
Works like a charm. Now the errors are clearly mine. Aargh!
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I've pushed a fix for the next release. In the meantime, here's a diff
> that should do the same for you.
>
> Thanks,
> Robby
>
> diff --git a/collects/planet/private/planet-shared.
I'm using syntax/modcode, and am running across an error that I don't
understand yet. Here's test code to demonstrate:
;;;
#lang racket
(require syntax/modcode)
(define collects-dir
(normalize-path
(let ([p (find-system-path 'collects-dir)])
(cond
[(
On May 20, 2011, at 1:48 AM, 김태윤 wrote:
> hello
> I am trying to make little human like text searching program
> but there's bug that I can't catch for many hours
> the bug is
> when text.txt file contains
> explorer
> and when I am trying to find
> exp
> then error arise
> when the text.txt cont
If someone came to you and said, "We're using PLT 4.2.5 with CGC and
JIT, and we are wondering whether reliability would be improved by
moving to Racket 5.x and/or moving to 3m and/or disabling 4.2.5's JIT,"
what would you say?
Details... A big installation of PLT 4.2.5 (with CGC, and with JIT
On 5/20/11 9:42 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Eli made Scribble's at-exp notation more general: It lets you pick the
brackets for a comment after `@;', so you can pick a closer that isn't
used in the region to comment out.
For example, to comment out a single "}",
@;{
}
}
would not work, b
At Fri, 20 May 2011 09:17:28 -0400, Prabhakar Ragde wrote:
> In Scheme I can comment out unfinished, unbalanced code:
>
> #|
>
> (define (my-function
>
> |#
>
> How do I do this in Scribble?
That only works in Scheme/Racket code if no unbalanced "|#" appears in
the region that you want to comm
In Scheme I can comment out unfinished, unbalanced code:
#|
(define (my-function
|#
How do I do this in Scribble? Thanks. --PR
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
Robby...k
My "<*>" chunk was called "*" (my mistake) and the e.g. I posted was typed
straight into the mail, and not properly tested.
Thanks for taking the time to respond, despite this accumulated muppetry.
Regards,
Tim
On 20/05/11 13:22, Robby Findler wrote:
That should work. When I requir
Most likely, you have run 'make', but not 'make install', and so the
source files in the collects haven't been precompiled. Try running
'make install' and you should see much better performance.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Janus Troelsen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm running a debug build of Ra
That should work. When I require that file I get this:
compile: unbound identifier in module in: define-empty-tokens
and then when I fix it like this:
@chunk[<*>
(require parser-tools/lex)
(define-empty-tokens mt-token-group ())]
things seem to work fine.
Robby
On Fri, May 20,
Hi guys,
I'm running a debug build of Racket 5.1.1. I expected poor
performance, but it is almost unusable:
oh05keny@client102:/nethome/fire01/disc04/users1/oh05keny/Downloads$
time ~/racket-5.1.1/bin/racket -e '"Hello World"'
"Hello World"
real2m9.988s
user1m19.825s
sys 0m0.720s
Is
Hello,
I'm writing a literate program which includes a lexer/parser.
I am trying to build up the lexer a token at a time...
-
#lang scribble/lp
@section{newlines}
A newline is at the end of a line... in fact we'll consume all newlines,
since we don't care how many there are.
@chunk[ new-
It seems your input data is not right here. I use your code (see below), it
works well (besides the overflow problem).
#lang racket
;it is list operation though parameter is str
;as little like human, check first and last character first
(define count 0)
(define data (string->list "explorers"))
(d
A quick look.
You're not guarding the list end ( (+ index len - 1) should be also less
than data-len), that's why you have index overflow error. Then when you
tried to search "2explorer" from "2explorers", the first turn of loop
failed, then the second turn of loop failed on "(equal? first-char (li
hello
I am trying to make little human like text searching program
but there's bug that I can't catch for many hours
the bug is
when text.txt file contains
explorer
and when I am trying to find
exp
then error arise
when the text.txt contains
explorers
and the time I trying to search
expl
the error
17 matches
Mail list logo
