Try this:
tar zxvf carali.tar.gz
cd carali
raco planet link schematics carali.plt 1 0 .
raco planet create .
HTH,
N.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Noel Welsh wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Mark Carter wrote:
>> A previous poster said that the #lang directive created an implicit mod
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Mark Carter wrote:
> A previous poster said that the #lang directive created an implicit module.
> However, this doesn't seem to be strictly true, as my function http-get is
> automatically "provided" without explicit mention; which is not the same
> behaviour as wh
OK, I'm trying to generate module docs, so I run
raco setup
but I get
raco setup: --- building documentation ---
raco setup: error running: (lib carali/http.rkt)
dynamic-require: name is not provided: 'doc by module:
#
raco setup: rendering: scribblings/main/start.scrbl
Any clues on this one
This doesn't seem to help with the problem facing planet, namely how
to tell if it is safe to instantiate a module twice or not. Planet can
already instantiate both modules fine -- it just need to know it is
safe to do so.
In your A/Z example, the question is if A and Z communicate B version
1 val
Lib A can link to an instantiation of Lib B version 1
and
Lib Z can link to an instantiation of Lib B version 2
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> How?
>
> Robby
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>>
>> Units would solve this problem.
>>
>>
How?
Robby
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Units would solve this problem.
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Mark Engelberg
>> wrote:
>>> The following two lines trigger an error:
>>>
>>> (require (planet
> From: Vincent St-Amour
> A #lang declaration implicitly wraps the rest of the file in a module
> form. Putting an explicit module form there is redundant, and is an
> error.
Ah, well, that is interesting. Many thanks.
_
For list-related adm
Units would solve this problem.
On Apr 7, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Mark Engelberg
> wrote:
>> The following two lines trigger an error:
>>
>> (require (planet dherman/memoize:3:1))
>> (require (planet soegaard/math:1:4/math))
>>
>> The error
Responder wrote:
--- begin ---
You need to enable @{...} syntax.
If you module currently starts
#lang racket/base
change it to
#lang at-exp racket/base
which mixes @{...} syntax support onto the `racket/base' language.
--- end ---
My reply:
It doesn't work. I get
module: illegal use (not
You need to enable @{...} syntax.
If you module currently starts
#lang racket/base
change it to
#lang at-exp racket/base
which mixes @{...} syntax support onto the `racket/base' language.
At Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:05:36 +0100 (BST), Mark Carter wrote:
> OK, I cleared up some of my problems in a
Thanks!
-- Éric
On Apr 7, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> @;{ this is a
> comment
> that spans lines }
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the Scribble language, @; introduces a comment.
>> I'm looking for the Scribble equivalents of #| |#
@;{ this is a
comment
that spans lines }
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the Scribble language, @; introduces a comment.
> I'm looking for the Scribble equivalents of #| |# and #;
> I've tried the obvious (@#|, @#;) but it does not work.
>
> Is there a way to comm
Hi,
In the Scribble language, @; introduces a comment.
I'm looking for the Scribble equivalents of #| |# and #;
I've tried the obvious (@#|, @#;) but it does not work.
Is there a way to comment out a region in Scribble?
Thanks,
-- Éric
_
For l
Also very interesting is eli's
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2008/02/dirty-looking-hygiene.html
Teaches how to ittify with syntax-rules and syntax-parameterize.
Jos
_
From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org]
On Behalf Of Stephen De Gabrielle
Sent: 05 April
OK, I cleared up some of my problems in a previous post. It seems I have to do
raco setup
to rebuild the module and documentation.
There's a problem, though. I have:
(provide/doc
(proc-doc/names
http-get
(-> string?
string?) ; the output
(string-url)
@{Say something meaningful
Hi all,
In the same way that it is possible to require a file given a local path:
eg.
(require (file "/home//foo.rkt"))
I'm looking for a way to require a file given a URL:
eg.
(require (url "http://tmp.barzilay.org/defmac.ss";))
The above does not work because url is not a require sub-form.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> The following two lines trigger an error:
>
> (require (planet dherman/memoize:3:1))
> (require (planet soegaard/math:1:4/math))
>
> The error says something along the lines that the soegaard package
> requires an older version of the memoize
I'm still quite puzzled as to how to document my modules.
I have a directory called "carali", which contains rkt files. One of the files
is http.rkt, containing the code:
(module maths racket
(provide http-get)
(require racket/port)
(require net/url)
(require scribble/srcdoc)
(provide/doc (
18 matches
Mail list logo
