I think one thing that could help here is just changing the first
line. It explicitly says "could not be applied to arguments", but
that's just false here. The function memq can obviously be applied to
those arguments. It just can't give the expected result type. How
about "...can not be applie
I was working on the following snippet of code in Typed Racket:
;;;
(define-type InstructionSequence (U Symbol instruction-sequence))
(define-struct: instruction-sequence ([needs : (Listof Symbol)]
At Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:08:10 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> We've never tried to pin down the behavior of overlapping children in a
> panel, and it varies among platforms. Actually, we tried long ago to
> make the order consistent, and there were too many problems on some
> platforms.
>
> I think t
Thanks for the reply, but going through that process would be to troublesome
and it needs to be platform independent. In the mean time I just changed the
order in which the children are added to suit the current implementation. Not a
very clean solution, but will do for now as I am still hoping
4 matches
Mail list logo
