Re: [racket] DrRacket: suppress newline when forcing evaluation?

Thanks, this is now fixed in GIT and will be in our (upcoming) next release. Robby On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Benjamin Rahn wrote: > I've just started using DrRacket on OS X (10.5), and there's an odd behavior > that I'm finding somewhat frustrating. > > http://docs.racket-lang.org/drrack

Re: [racket] separate keybindings for interaction vs. definition window

Here's a more detailed reply. This is the code you want, I believe: #lang s-exp framework/keybinding-lang (require drracket/tool-lib) (define (rebind key function) (keybinding key (lambda (editor event) (send (send editor get-keymap) call-function (if (is-a? editor

Re: [racket] Efficiency of tight loops in Racket

Is there a specific reason why there is no parallel support for place on a dual core processor with Windows 7. Thanks, Jos > -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org > [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Robby Findler > Sent: 14 January 2011 22:30 > To: Har

Re: [racket] Confusing behavior with continuation-marks

The fix seems to work, but it doesn't work for the value parameterization-key exported by #%paramz. (require '#%paramz) (define value 'value) (define (test key) (with-continuation-mark key value (call-with-continuation-prompt (lambda () (continuation-mark-set-first #f

[racket] some questions about mysterx

Hi, all! I have some questions about mysterx. 1) Why there isn't function for destruction com-object (like vlax-release-object in AutoLisp)? When I end to work with com-application, it still in system processes. 2) When I use mysterx, my applications sometimes crashes with standart Windows messa

Re: [racket] Confusing behavior with continuation-marks

There were two problems: * `continuation-mark-set-first' wasn't correctly using the given prompt tag to delimit the search for a mark (which explains the wrong value for the first and fourth tests); * the documentation was wrong, because the prompt-tag argument is actually the fourth a

Re: [racket] Confusing behavior with continuation-marks

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Eric Dobson wrote: > I was looking at the documentation on how continuation-marks work, and > the documented behavior is different than what I observed. > > The following programs add a continuation mark, then a prompt, then > try to look at the current continuati

Re: [racket] response/xexpr missing?

In whatever version you are using, it is simply not necessary for whatever you're doing because the older versions accept xexprs implicitly. Jay 2011/1/15 Alexander Asteroth : > Thank's! So I will change to the nightliy build. > > Am 14.01.2011 um 21:53 schrieb Jay McCarthy: > >> It was added dur

[racket] Expanding frozen Racket core - limitations of universal touring machine

Hi all, Regarding Liitin project... Imagine the following setup: - A read-only OS environment (networked, unified number crunchers) - Access to infinite amount of data (external, global database objects) - Limitless processing power (actually both data and processing power are limited at any gi

Re: [racket] response/xexpr missing?

Thank's! So I will change to the nightliy build. Am 14.01.2011 um 21:53 schrieb Jay McCarthy: > It was added during the time between the last release and the current > release (which will come out imminently.) > > Jay > > 2011/1/14 Alexander Asteroth : >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying out the racket