Re: [racket] New Blog Plugs Racket

2010-11-26 Thread TatiCarvalho
Patrick King writes: >Does anybody know an easy way to preserve formatting (especially > indentation) when cutting and pasting from DrRacket to blogspot?TIAPat Hi Patrick, give it a try here: http://formatmysourcecode.blogspot.com/ or here http://www.craftyfella.com/2010/01/syntax-highlighting-

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-26 Thread prad
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:27:41 -0500 Neil Van Dyke wrote: > For Racket, I think you don't need to distinguish between > "scheme-send-definition" and "scheme-compile-definition" -- just > pretend that the ``compile'' isn't there. > yes i discovered that last night. > That said, if there's still s

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-26 Thread Neil Van Dyke
prad wrote at 11/26/2010 03:11 AM: i'm trying to get quack to work with emacs and it is very nice for the most part. however, i can't get C-c C-c to work. C-c C-c doesn't work. It's a cmuscheme.el thing that I never touched, since Quack is supposed to work for all Schemes. For Racket, I thin

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-26 Thread Noel Welsh
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, prad wrote: > any thoughts on what i can do to get C-c C-c working? Dunno (I develop in a different style) but I can recommend the Geiser Emacs package: http://www.nongnu.org/geiser/ It has been worked on more recently AFAIK, so might work for you. HTH, N. __

Re: [racket] Racket 5.0.99.2 on OS X

2010-11-26 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 25 Nov 2010 21:30:59 +0100, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote: > I tried to install the new Racket nightly on OS X (the previous one was > missing cairo IIRC). Can you tell me more about your system, including the processor and OS version? > 1. Different (horrible) antialiased font rendering when

[racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-26 Thread prad
greetings! i just started with racket having done a bit of mit-scheme and commonlisp. i'm trying to get quack to work with emacs and it is very nice for the most part. however, i can't get C-c C-c to work. if i go to the middle of something like: (define (add3 n) (+ n 3)) and do C-c C-c (comp