On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
> If you don't mind, "like it" on Facebook and spread the word. Here's the link:
That is great. Done.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
Emmanuel Schanzer started a facebook campaign for Bootstrap, our educational
outreach project for middle schools. The goal is to get 1000-people to like it
by national education week.
If you don't mind, "like it" on Facebook and spread the word. Here's the link:
> [http://www.facebook.com/p
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Peter Breitsprecher
wrote:
> I have a program that is a simple reader. Reads the user input character
> by character, and then creates a list of values. Right now it only works
> with numbers, but i will add functionality for reading characters. Right
> now it w
I have a program that is a simple reader. Reads the user input character by
character, and then creates a list of values. Right now it only works with
numbers, but i will add functionality for reading characters. Right now it
will work, and just accept the numbers and create the list which is gr
scouic schrieb:
> or :
> - you must click and hold the click, then get off the mouse as if the
> menu appeared. At this point, menu appears ...
> - click and get off the mouse, menu appears
> - use the keys ALT+F for example for the file
No, that does not work here. But now I had success with:
Kli
Four hours ago, Keiko Nakata wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Is there some material (preferably something that I can refer to as
> well), which supports this implementation?
No, but there's some comments, and lots of history...
> It looks clever.
I'm not sure that it's a good term -- you've
I had a student get an error message about Preferences and the choices were
"Steal lock & key" and "retry". I selected "Steal lock & key" and the message
went away, but he lost some of his work. Anyone had this message before and
can explain it?
Kevin Blythe
Aberdeen High School Teacher
Thanks for the reply.
Is there some material (preferably something that I can refer to as well),
which supports this implementation?
It looks clever.
Keiko
From: Eli Barzilay
Subject: Re: [racket] iterative lazy space-safe or not?
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:28:49 -0500
> 20 minutes ago, Kei
On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Jim Wise wrote:
> I've noticed that beginning student language does not allow definition
> of a function which takes no arguments
> It's not obvious to me why this is the case. I can sort of guess at the
> reasoning, and it makes some sense -- such a function is
>
> > By clicking the textes (i.e. "File") nothing happens, no menu appears.
>
I had the same problem, but it's ok :
or :
- you must click and hold the click, then get off the mouse as if the menu
appeared. At this point, menu appears ...
- click and get off the mouse, menu appears
- use the keys
20 minutes ago, Keiko Nakata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the post-finalization discussion on iterative lazy algorithms (SRFI 45),
> (http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-45/post-mail-archive/msg00024.html)
> Andre van Tonder points that Eli's proposal,
> which I think is used in Racket roughly, is not memory sa
Hi,
In the post-finalization discussion on iterative lazy algorithms (SRFI 45),
(http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-45/post-mail-archive/msg00024.html)
Andre van Tonder points that Eli's proposal,
which I think is used in Racket roughly, is not memory safe.
But I do not get his point.
(force (letrec
12 matches
Mail list logo
