Just curious, does wescheme support "universe" programs? If so, what
does that support entail? Do you run both the server and client on
the wescheme website, or can you run the universe server on wescheme
and connect to it via desktop Racket running a universe client?
Hosting on AppEngine. We don't get much choice in server technology.
On Sep 14, 2010 9:53 PM, "namekuseijin" wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
>> Can't they already run WeScheme (www.wescheme.org)? Soon with #lang
modules,
>> etc. Save to the Web, access anyw
> well, for once, you're missing named lets... ;)
Ok; named lets will be there very very soon. (The new backend does
support it; I'm in the process of integrating the new backend with
WeScheme.org.)
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> Can't they already run WeScheme (www.wescheme.org)? Soon with #lang modules,
> etc. Save to the Web, access anywhere, etc. What am I missing?
curious...
well, for once, you're missing named lets... ;)
I wonder what's the deal with
This means that even function add1 cannot always be concidered to be O(1).
It may depend on the representation of numbers. In this sense I agree with
you.
Jos
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Bloch
>
>
> Can't they already run WeScheme (www.wescheme.org)? Soon with #lang
> modules, etc. Save to the Web, access anywhere, etc. What am I missing?
On my iPhone, no keyboard comes up when
I'm in the editor window.
--DGK
David G. Kay
k...@uci.edu
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Shriram Krishnam
2010/9/14 Stefan Busch :
> [...]
> The teaching material I got from university gives the following exanple for
> the usage
> of amb-collect:
>
> ***
>
> ;;get all pairs of values von a and b,
> ;;which have sum 7
>
Brent Fulgham wrote at 09/14/2010 03:55 PM:
has provided each student with a personal iPad, think that DrScheme on the iPad
would be a wonderful thing.
Does the current Apple text prohibit PLaneT?
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_
For list-re
Can't they already run WeScheme (www.wescheme.org)? Soon with #lang modules,
etc. Save to the Web, access anywhere, etc. What am I missing?
On Sep 14, 2010 3:56 PM, "Brent Fulgham" wrote:
> Considering that the private Scottish Ceders School
> (http://cedars.inverclyde.sch.uk/wiki/index.php?title
Considering that the private Scottish Ceders School
(http://cedars.inverclyde.sch.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page) has
provided each student with a personal iPad, think that DrScheme on the
iPad would be a wonderful thing.
Imagine students being able to create and test applications using such
a
> -Original Message-
> From: robby.find...@gmail.com
> [mailto:robby.find...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler
> Sent: 14 September 2010 17:16
> To: Stephen Bloch
> Cc: Jos Koot; users@racket-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [racket] Looking for feedback on code style
>
> I think that racke
Hello,
at compile-time.
Stefan
Am 14.09.2010 18:42, schrieb Deren Dohoda:
Stefan,
Are you trying to pass a run-time list to amb? Or just
(amb (list 1 2 3 ...)) at compile-time?
Deren
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Stefan Busch wrote:
Hello,
of course I have to use amb-collect.
Hello,
of course I have to use amb-collect.
Maybe I didnt describe my problem properly.
My intention is to pass the arguments to choose from in a list.
The teaching material I got from university gives the following exanple for the
usage
of amb-collect:
*
2010/9/14 Stefan Busch :
> [...]
> Your solution looked convincing to me,
> but when I try e.g.
>
> (amb list (list 1 2 3 4))
>
> it's not evaluated to the desired
>
> 1 2 3 4,
>
> but to
>
> 1.
> [...]
Hello,
I assume you meant to say (amb-list ...) instead of (amb list ...). Of course
this expr
On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Jos Koot wrote:
> The following measurement shows O(n).
> But O(n) = O(C+n) where C may be a big number.
More relevantly, O(n) is hard to distinguish experimentally from O(n log n).
In particular, all the sizes you seem to tried are well within a machine word,
so
I think that racket guarantees that no vector has more elements than
the size of the largest fixnum (to support optimizations).
Also, Jos: you might want to use time-apply.
Robby
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Jos Koot wrote:
>
>> The fol
The following measurement shows O(n).
But O(n) = O(C+n) where C may be a big number.
Jos
#lang racket
#|
(select k lor (randomize? #f)) -> r
k : exact integer number.
lor: non empty list of real numbers.
randomize? : if false lor is supposed to be in random order.
r :
Hello Will,
thanks for your suggestion.
Your solution looked convincing to me,
but when I try e.g.
(amb list (list 1 2 3 4))
it's not evaluated to the desired
1 2 3 4,
but to
1.
I think the problem is that the recursion doesn't work,
because if in
(amb (car list)
(amb-list (cdr
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle
wrote:
>> create and use their own interpreted languages within apps, as long as they
>>aren't downloaded,
>
> DrScheme on the iPad?
Racket apps on the iPad/iPhone/iPodTouch would be a "killer dev tool".
>From a research side of things there
> create and use their own interpreted languages within apps, as long as they
>aren't downloaded,
DrScheme on the iPad?
I'm joking.
:)
On Tuesday, September 14, 2010, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> John Clements wrote at 09/13/2010 11:44 PM:
>
> Again, this change would seem to be designed to allow d
20 matches
Mail list logo
