On 06/30/2010 03:04 AM, Noel Welsh wrote:
> I really
> think the Scheme world would be much much much better served by these
> developers contributing their efforts to a single implementation.
In particular, one nice thing about Racket is that it provides not so
much a language implementation, bu
Ya :) It works but I don't think it is the right way to do it.
Jay
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> "easy" is great. I assume I should ignore the comment that says
>
> ; XXX This is almost certainly wrong.
>
> Shriram
>
--
Jay McCarthy
Assistant Professor /
"easy" is great. I assume I should ignore the comment that says
; XXX This is almost certainly wrong.
Shriram
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:50 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
>
> I think a lot of people on the list would be interested if you can sketch
> what's involved here.
It's all spelled out on http://www.google.com/webmasters/
--
~jrm
_
For list-related
First solution works well in my case as I have around 25 data
structures all of which have map and fold functions.
Thanks for the help.
Hari
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Flatt"
To: "Hari Prashanth"
Cc: "plt-scheme"
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:02:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada E
On Jun 30, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >
> >
> > Also, I think that Google uses dmoz for the search result blurbs,
>
> That definitely doesn't seem to be the case here,
Not with Racket, probably because it's new. Look for "plt scheme",
the
At Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:21:19 -0400 (EDT), Hari Prashanth wrote:
> I have a function by name map. For its documentation, I have
> something like
>
> @defproc[(map ...) (...)]{
> @scheme[map] is similar to @scheme[map]
> }
>
> The want the latter @scheme[map] to refer map provided by lists.
>
> Ho
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
>
> Also, I think that Google uses dmoz for the search result blurbs,
That definitely doesn't seem to be the case here, since Racket doesn't
seem to be on dmoz at all. Google takes the snippet from the page
directly.
--
sam th
sa...@ccs.ne
On Jun 30, David Van Horn wrote:
> On 6/30/10 4:43 PM, Joe Marshall wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> >>
> >> Someone who really wants to do this optimally will have to look up the
> >> latest SEO rules of thumb for what to do and not do on this page.
> >
> > It'
On Jun 30, Joe Marshall wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> >
> > Someone who really wants to do this optimally will have to look up
> > the latest SEO rules of thumb for what to do and not do on this
> > page.
>
> It'll take a small amount of time investment (perhaps
On 6/30/10 4:43 PM, Joe Marshall wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Someone who really wants to do this optimally will have to look up the
latest SEO rules of thumb for what to do and not do on this page.
It'll take a small amount of time investment (perhaps ten t
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Someone who really wants to do this optimally will have to look up the
> latest SEO rules of thumb for what to do and not do on this page.
It'll take a small amount of time investment (perhaps ten total hours), but
you ought to be able to
Have you considered naming your function blah-map, where blah is the
kind of structure you expect it to work on, so that both your map and
the built-in map for lists could be available without shadowing one
another?
Todd
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Hari Prashanth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a f
Interesting and very cool.
Instead of client I should have said IDE.
Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: shri...@gmail.com [mailto:shri...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Shriram
> Krishnamurthi
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:28 PM
> To: engin...@alum.mit.edu
> Cc: Carl Eastlund; Racket Use
This is very easy to do.
If you take a look at
http://github.com/plt/racket/blob/master/collects/datalog/lang/reader.rkt
You'll see that there is one parser and compiler for the module body
(this-read-syntax) and there is another for the REPL interactions
(parse-statement). In this case one is a
Paul,
You can already run WeScheme on your Android:
http://www.wescheme.org/
Due to a complete rewrite this summer, WeScheme and Racket will come
ever closer together.
But I may be misunderstanding what you mean by "client".
Shriram
_
For lis
Hi,
I have a function by name map. For its documentation, I have
something like
@defproc[(map ...) (...)]{
@scheme[map] is similar to @scheme[map]
}
The want the latter @scheme[map] to refer map provided by lists.
How can I do that? Can someone help me out with this?
Thanks
Hari
__
Surely someone here has done something like this before, and I'd like
advice on how to do it.
We're in the process of converting Margrave, our security analysis
tool, over to Racket, and to exploit DrRacket as its user environment.
What we'd like to be able to do is this: in DrRacket,
Interact
I had drscheme up till February on an asus 4g 701 with a 7 inch
screen, running the latest ubuntu 'full' (netbook remix doesn't fit on
the small screen). I did upgrade the ram to 2gb, removed extra apps
and had 4gb sd card salvaged from a camera, which is where I compiled
drscheme(overnight).
It w
On Jun 30, Robby Findler wrote:
> Sounds very advanced to me. In all seriousness, answers to those
> questions are not the kind of things I would pay money for anyways.
> The kinds of questions I pay money for are more like "make this
> thing work again; it is broken." (which isn't a question, I
>
Man, politeness is such a racket.
Robby
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Well, a polite person would phrase this as "could you fix this ... please?"
>
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> Sounds very advanced to me. In all seriousness, answers to
Well, a polite person would phrase this as "could you fix this ...
please?"
On Jun 30, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Sounds very advanced to me. In all seriousness, answers to those
questions are not the kind of things I would pay money for anyways.
The kinds of questions I pay mon
Sounds very advanced to me. In all seriousness, answers to those
questions are not the kind of things I would pay money for anyways.
The kinds of questions I pay money for are more like "make this thing
work again; it is broken." (which isn't a question, I know. ...)
Robby
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at
Are there plans for a DrRacket client for Android? I wouldn't be surprised
if netbooks start coming with Android. (Lenovo hybrid netbook/tablet et al)
Dual-core 1.5GHz smartphones (and netbooks?) seems to be on the horizon.
I await the day when my smartphone will dock like my laptop and become
On Jun 30, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
>
> Of course, you won't get Apple-level support from Acer. But that
> cuts both ways (Acer support staff don't assume they are inherently
> more advanced genetic beings).
??
When I got the #(@^(!&* ipad, I called Apple support to ask how I can
transfer r
I find DrRacket very hard to use on older machines and netbooks.
I recently upgraded to an Acer Aspire 1810T. This is about $600 and
has a netbook form factor (same chassis as the 1410T, which is their
netbook). The 1366x768 screen makes the keyboard nice and wide and
great for use in travel. W
Thanks for the feedback, everyone! I'll get shopping soon.
--Carl
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Does anyone out there know what kind would be suitable? I have not
> looked at low-end portable computers in some time, so I don't know
> what kind of performance to expe
On Wednesday 30 June 2010, Neil Toronto said:
> It'll drive any VGA projector or monitor under 2048x2048, and the newer
> models probably do more and have digital output. It tends to take longer
> than 3x to compile Slideshow apps compared to my desktop, but it's
> snappy enough once that's don
I'm regularly using an HP mini-note. The nearly full size keyboard
makes a difference for me, as does the extra screen resolution, but it
is pricy for a netbook.
It can only drive an external display at 640x480, tho. The ubuntu
netbook remix does a nice job with the limited screen real estate, but
I'm running Racket on an Eee-PC 1000H with Ubuntu Netbook Remix and it's
adequate. Performance is about what you'd expect for something about a
third as fast as a desktop. The keys are comfy and the 1024x600 screen
tends to hold enough Scheme/LaTeX code. Netbook Remix is good about
maximizing s
I killed my laptop recently -- spilled a glass of milk right on the
keyboard -- and I need a cheap replacement for when I'm travelling.
This will not be my primary development machine. The only absolute
need I have from it is to be able to run Slideshow presentations,
though being able to meaningf
You want to create a tool, add in a frame-mixin (both via the tools
interface), and then use the frame:basic<%> mechanism for adding
panels to the frame.
If that's not enough to get you started, I'll write up a little
example tool that does it.
Robby
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Stephen De G
On Jun 30, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Horace Dynamite wrote:
Hi Barry,
I noticed that beginning students are able to use list abbreviation
constructors. It doesn't return the list in abbreviated form,
however.
(list 1 2 3)
returns
(cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 empty)))
Is that correct?
Yes. It acco
Hi,
Please forgive my ignorance, I'm trying to work out how to add a panel
(like program contour) to DrRacket.
Does anyone know the correct method, or can point me to source code, or the
right bit of the documentation?
Cheers,
Stephen
_
For lis
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Noel Welsh wrote:
> Look at Ikarus for example: a
> great compiler but there hasn't been a new release for 2 years.
I think Aziz has been more active than that, but just hasn't been
making formal releases.
Robby
_
Something has definitely gone wrong; I'll fix it.
Meanwhile, you can still use `mzc' (which will stick around a while for
compatibility):
mzc --c-mods base.c ++lib racket/base
At Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:43:14 +0200, gabor papp wrote:
> According to the Inside Racket C API
> (http://docs.racket-l
According to the Inside Racket C API
(http://docs.racket-lang.org/inside/overview.html) example
embedding Racket into a program requires the 'raco ctool --c-mods base.c
++lib racket/base' command, but it gives an error:
raco ctool: unknown switch: ++lib
I guess it is different with raco than it
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Ryan Newton wrote:
> PLT has PLaneT, of course, but personally I think it would be desirable to
> have basic, common packages target R6RS if they can fit there comfortably.
> If no one else steps up, can PLaneT be made a multi-language package
> manager, as Racket
Hi Barry,
> I noticed that beginning students are able to use list abbreviation
> constructors. It doesn't return the list in abbreviated form, however.
>
> (list 1 2 3)
> returns
> (cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 empty)))
>
> Is that correct?
I've noticed some overlaps of functionality between the teac
I noticed that beginning students are able to use list abbreviation
constructors. It doesn't return the list in abbreviated form, however.
(list 1 2 3)
returns
(cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 empty)))
Is that correct? I thought list abbreviations in all its forms were reserved
for the Beginning Student
40 matches
Mail list logo
