Actually it does but it is diasabled by default. But the point was
that you would not do it that way but instead use the lang and macro
system to implement your translation.
Robby
On Monday, June 21, 2010, Valeriya Pudova wrote:
> On 21.06.2010 18:32, Robby Findler wrote:
>
> I haven't followed
On 21.06.2010 18:25, Noel Welsh wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Valeriya Pudova
wrote:
There are two issues.
First:
what if the file foo.ss will have defined function foo.
(define (foo a b) (+ a b)))
(foo 1 2)
It makes error:
Got compile: unbound identifier (and no #%app syntax
On 21.06.2010 18:32, Robby Findler wrote:
I haven't followed this thread too closely but if you can tolerate
your "a.ss" file having a "#lang" line at the top that may make your
life overall much easier (the Racket tools all work better when you
are explicit about the language you are programming
I haven't followed this thread too closely but if you can tolerate
your "a.ss" file having a "#lang" line at the top that may make your
life overall much easier (the Racket tools all work better when you
are explicit about the language you are programming in).
Robby
___
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Valeriya Pudova
wrote:
> There are two issues.
>
> First:
>
> what if the file foo.ss will have defined function foo.
>
> (define (foo a b) (+ a b)))
> (foo 1 2)
>
> It makes error:
> Got compile: unbound identifier (and no #%app syntax transformer is bound)
> (#(s
> > name space
> > where are defined methods "define-fsm", "define-state", "on-event" and
> "go"
> >
> > But this case each of those methods will not have the syntax object of
> the
> > evaluated expression.
> > And in case if it will find and error it could not message about error's
> > location.
> To bring this more on topic, I think a good approach to all these issues from
> a Racket perspective is to develop an HTML5 web-app framework that
> intelligently adjusts content for the device making the request. This way
> Racket apps could run across all platforms with a decent HTML5 browse
Please reply to the list; you'll get more help that way. (Also, I'll
ignore your emails if you don't.)
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Valeriya Pudova
wrote:
> The question is: when in the eval-synax process there will be called some
> function how that function can to reffer to the current syn
Please reply to the list; you'll get more help that way.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Valeriya Pudova
wrote:
> (eval-syntax (file->syntax "a.ss"))
Look up read-syntax.
> lets imagine the function 'define-fsm' was called. And "some-condition?"
> informs that there are syntax error in the so
On Jun 18, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Paul Ojanen wrote:
Remember, this isn't even a question of what you can run on your
iPhone
-- the (free!) iPhone developer kit lets you download software you
compile yourself from your computer to the iPhone.
Their SDK runs on MY computer?
Well, yes -- if yo
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Valeriya Pudova
wrote:
> The easiest way to do this task can be: Just evaluate the file "a.ss" in the
> name space
> where are defined methods "define-fsm", "define-state", "on-event" and "go"
>
> But this case each of those methods will not have the syntax object
11 matches
Mail list logo
