Hi
The TMB package has Matrix in its LinkingTo dependencies. In a clean
package library, I see behavior posted below.
Should the TMB package have been rebuilt when a new version of the
Matrix package was pushed? More general, should we rebuild all reverse
LinkingTo dependencies of a package
On 25.09.2023 20:46, Kirill Müller via R-SIG-Mac wrote:
Hi
The TMB package has Matrix in its LinkingTo dependencies. In a clean
package library, I see behavior posted below.
Should the TMB package have been rebuilt when a new version of the
Matrix package was pushed? More general, should
Kirill,
we have no way of knowing when a packages introduced a breaking change (which
it really shouldn't), so the maintainers would have to inform as (Matrix
authors did inform us that 1.6.0 introduces breaking change so that's why we
did a manual re-bulid on that update). Also checking exact
> On 26/09/2023, at 12:28 PM, Kirill Müller wrote:
>
> Thanks, Simon and Uwe, for your inputs.
>
> It's not that TMB requires a particular version of Matrix, it just suggests
> using the same version of Matrix as it was built with. We may have seen this
> problem before, with innocuous chan
Thanks, Simon and Uwe, for your inputs.
It's not that TMB requires a particular version of Matrix, it just
suggests using the same version of Matrix as it was built with. We may
have seen this problem before, with innocuous changes in Rcpp breaking
downstream packages.
A different example, run
