On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:24 PM peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> > On 23 Jan 2020, at 12:15 , Adrian Dușa wrote:
> > [...]
> > Curiously though, I run the very same R version on both computers and I
would have expected RNGkind() to work the same.
>
> The most likely explanation is that on one machine yo
> On 23 Jan 2020, at 12:15 , Adrian Dușa wrote:
>
> Dear Peter,
>
> Thanks, it's good to know there is a good explanation for this and also the
> sample.kind is now more stable.
> Curiously though, I run the very same R version on both computers and I would
> have expected RNGkind() to work
Dear Peter,
Thanks, it's good to know there is a good explanation for this and also the
sample.kind is now more stable.
Curiously though, I run the very same R version on both computers and I
would have expected RNGkind() to work the same.
Best,
Adrian
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:18 AM peter dalg
That's the effect of RNGkind(sample.kind="Rejection") which is the new default.
Unfortunately, the older and buggy "Rounding" has a tendency to linger in saved
workspaces.
-pd
> RNGkind(sample.kind="Rejection")
> set.seed(12)
> sample(letters[1:10])
[1] "b" "g" "c" "f" "e" "i" "d" "j" "h" "a"
