On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 1:09 AM Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> Your subject line is alarmist -- you only provide any evidence for 1 out
> of > 19000 CRAN packages (and not R itself).
>
As my goal was to coax a local Expeditionary HS Science teacher to use
Rattle , it was the only fraction of the sui
On 27/02/2023 08:09, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
Your subject line is alarmist -- you only provide any evidence for 1 out
of > 19000 CRAN packages (and not R itself).
Package RGtk2 was archived in 2021. The current rattle (5.5.1) does not
depend on it. A direct download is available from rattle
Your subject line is alarmist -- you only provide any evidence for 1 out
of > 19000 CRAN packages (and not R itself).
Package RGtk2 was archived in 2021. The current rattle (5.5.1) does not
depend on it. A direct download is available from rattle's CRAN landing
page. You have not told us wh
I've tried several (4.2 branches.pkg, R-GUI8191 dmg R installs fine,
but attempts to the load rattle fail. If I missed some obvious
configuration switch, feel free to point me at the FM! ;>
Seems to me that the downloads marked arm64 should only suck in
arm64-compatible dependencies..
. libra
