[R-pkg-devel] Should I ignore a remote-check NOTE on 'Author field differs from Authors@R'?

# BACKGROUND I maintain the 'oce' package, and to avoid problems when I submit a new version, I do some remote tests using * devtools::check_mac_release() * devtools::check_win_release() * devtools::check_win_devel() * devtools::check_win_oldrelease() # problem I found that the mac upload fails

Re: [R-pkg-devel] A way to prepend/append some code before/after running package examples? (e.g. to setup CPU resource usage limits for package example run or to clean up generated files)

Hi again, Thanks @Dirk for pointing the issue with the encoding of my original message (it cannot be read from the list archive either). I do not understand what could have been the problem since there was no issue with other mails sent to the list earlier on the same day in the same conditio

Re: [R-pkg-devel] ggsmc: failed check

Am 10.07.25 um 13:27 schrieb Richard Everitt: My R package ggsmc has been removed from CRAN after a failed check (see here https://cran-archive.r-project.org/web/checks/2025/2025-07-05_check_results_ggsmc.html). I have not been able to reproduce locally the error mentioned in t

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Should I ignore a remote-check NOTE on 'Author field differs from Authors@R'?

On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:50:44 + Daniel Kelley wrote: > My concern is with the last test, i.e. on system > > R version 4.4.3 (2025-02-28 ucrt) > > It produces one NOTE. Looking into this, I see the following in the > 00check.log file: > > * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... NOTE > A