Hi Simon,
THX for the clarification and additional work I have caused.
Helmut
Simon Urbanek wrote on 2023-06-24 06:51:
On Jun 24, 2023, at 12:19 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
On 23.06.2023 11:27, Helmut Schütz wrote:
Dear all,
since a while (January?) we face NOTEs in package checks
(https://
Doesnt seem like the system package is worth it. Should the convention
simply be to bundle the headers in the package then? What about package
size - is there some limit to the size of included libraries/headers to
consider for CRAN?
On Sat, 24 June 2023, 15:08 Simon Urbanek,
wrote:
> Stephen,
>
On 24 June 2023 at 21:35, Stephen Wade wrote:
| Doesnt seem like the system package is worth it. Should the convention
| simply be to bundle the headers in the package then? What about package
| size - is there some limit to the size of included libraries/headers to
| consider for CRAN?
Here is
Cheers Dirk and Simon for your advice, very helpful and clear.
It's certainly a complex problem, way above my experience and pay grade.
I've decided the solution for me would be to remove the dependency on Eigen
altogether, as I am only constructing and accessing sparse matrices at the
library-le
Hi,
I know that sounds like a useless feature, but it happens that people are
better in recognising names than numbers.
And here is the question. I read in some stackexchange answers that it is
possible to add the keyword
Nickname:
to the description file. It works fine when I check the packag
