Dear colleagues,
as recommended by rOpenSci (see
https://ropensci.org/technotes/2020/11/19/moving-away-travis/) , I am moving to
GitHub Actions for the CI for my R packages.
My test case is the “bignlp” package I currently develop
(https://github.com/https://github.com/PolMine/bignlpPolMine/bi
Hey,
Very interesting. I just made rJava work for Linux:
https://github.com/petermeissner/kafkaesque/blob/master/.github/workflows/tests.yml
Best, Peter
Blätte, Andreas schrieb am Fr. 22. Jan. 2021
um 17:38:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> as recommended by rOpenSci (see
> https://ropensci.org/tech
Greetings,
I'm writing to see if anyone has suggestions for how to handle an issue I'm
facing with the clubSandwich package (
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich; Github repo:
https://github.com/jepusto/clubSandwich). The package documentation uses
the fairly new package mathjaxr (http
Hi James,
On 22 January 2021 at 14:29, James Pustejovsky wrote:
| I'm writing to see if anyone has suggestions for how to handle an issue I'm
| facing with the clubSandwich package (
| https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich; Github repo:
| https://github.com/jepusto/clubSandwich). The p
Dirk,
Thanks very much for your input! By "patch it out" do you mean modify my
package description for the Debian distribution only? Would it work to
create a separate branch of my Github repo with modifications for the
Debian distro, and then submit that directly to Debian maintainers?
I'm sorry
Hi James,
On 22 January 2021 at 15:42, James Pustejovsky wrote:
| Thanks very much for your input! By "patch it out" do you mean modify my
| package description for the Debian distribution only? Would it work to
And code / content! Can't just alter the DESCRIPTION if the Rd still call
mathjaxr
