On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> I'm not sure if that's correct -- from what I see, in the generated Rd
> documentation:
>
> - The 'usage' is drawn from the S4 generic,
> - The 'arguments' are drawn from the function.
>
> I think R CMD check is correctly warning about that.
A
On 31/07/2015 6:14 PM, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> I'm not sure if that's correct -- from what I see, in the generated Rd
> documentation:
>
> - The 'usage' is drawn from the S4 generic,
> - The 'arguments' are drawn from the function.
>
> I think R CMD check is correctly warning about that.
I agree th
I'm not sure if that's correct -- from what I see, in the generated Rd
documentation:
- The 'usage' is drawn from the S4 generic,
- The 'arguments' are drawn from the function.
I think R CMD check is correctly warning about that.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>> It see
>> It seems arguable that this is actually a roxygen bug - the function
>> that's actually exported from the package does not have a type
>> argument.
>
> The package fails R CMD check because of a bad .Rd file. If a user had
> written that file, it would be user error, but roxygen2 wrote it, so I
On 31/07/2015 7:11 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> It seems arguable that this is actually a roxygen bug - the function
> that's actually exported from the package does not have a type
> argument.
The package fails R CMD check because of a bad .Rd file. If a user had
written that file, it would be us
It seems arguable that this is actually a roxygen bug - the function
that's actually exported from the package does not have a type
argument.
Hadley
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> I've posted an MRE at https://github.com/klutometis/roxygen/issues/362.
>
> The issue occurs
I've posted an MRE at https://github.com/klutometis/roxygen/issues/362.
The issue occurs when a function and an S4 generic have the same name;
I imagine this is fairly uncommon? Wouldn't the function be masked by
the S4 generic and effectively be invisible after the package was
loaded?
On Thu, Ju
On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 30/07/2015 9:14 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > On 30/07/2015 8:49 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I have a package stable and working. Now, I am trying to consolidate
> some functions that share similar inputs. Example below.
On 30/07/2015 9:14 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 30/07/2015 8:49 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a package stable and working. Now, I am trying to consolidate some
>> functions that share similar inputs. Example below. So, I branched on
>> github and work with the branch but
On 30/07/2015 8:49 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a package stable and working. Now, I am trying to consolidate some
> functions that share similar inputs. Example below. So, I branched on
> github and work with the branch but now when I run the R check in studio I
> get the f
10 matches
Mail list logo
