Re: [R-pkg-devel] Write and print Fortran commands yields Note in R CMD check

2017-09-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 September 2017 at 15:56, Stefan McKinnon Høj-Edwards wrote: | Oh. I was under the impression the risk of interference was only for stdout | and stderr. | | I suspect the affected Fortran subroutines should be re-written in R or C. | Is writing to files with Rcpp affected by the interference

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Write and print Fortran commands yields Note in R CMD check

2017-09-14 Thread Stefan McKinnon Høj-Edwards
Oh. I was under the impression the risk of interference was only for stdout and stderr. I suspect the affected Fortran subroutines should be re-written in R or C. Is writing to files with Rcpp affected by the interference? Or would it be feasible to have the Fortran subroutine call a C subroutine

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Write and print Fortran commands yields Note in R CMD check

2017-09-14 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 14/09/2017 9:20 AM, Stefan McKinnon Høj-Edwards wrote: Dear all, I am in the process of preparing a R-package that uses Fortran subroutines, and upon R CMD check (both local and on win-builder), I receive the following Note: File 'Siccuracy/libs/i386/Siccuracy.dll': Found '_gfortran_st_wr