Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:45:22 -0400
From: Duncan Murdoch mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>>
To: Shivaram Venkataraman mailto:shivaram.venkatara...@gmail.com>>, Ben
Bolker mailto:bbol...@gmail.com>>
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
<ma
1.7.0 to CRAN and
> ask
> >> his users to update to that version to get the patch. There should be
> no
> >> downside of having the other changes to 'yourpackage'. If, on the other
> >> hand, 'yourpackage' has changed from 1.6 to 1.7 so much th
>> his users to update to that version to get the patch. There should be no
>> downside of having the other changes to 'yourpackage'. If, on the other
>> hand, 'yourpackage' has changed from 1.6 to 1.7 so much that it computes
>> different resul
rent
package name ('yourpackage-2'). In that case CRAN should allow both
packages to exist side-by-side in the repository.
Cheers,
Bruce
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:45:22 -0400
From: Duncan Murdoch
To: Shivaram Venkataraman , Ben
Bolker
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subjec
then perhaps it should be published under a different
package name ('yourpackage-2'). In that case CRAN should allow both
packages to exist side-by-side in the repository.
Cheers,
Bruce
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:45:22 -0400
From: Duncan Murdoch
To: Shivaram Venkataraman , Ben
On 25/10/2017 4:28 PM, Shivaram Venkataraman wrote:
Thanks for all the replies. I can see that the monotonic ordering is
in-built to support the latest / best version model that CRAN has. That
said it would be great if the policy could be relaxed to allow uploading
older versions which don't nece
Thanks for all the replies. I can see that the monotonic ordering is
in-built to support the latest / best version model that CRAN has. That
said it would be great if the policy could be relaxed to allow uploading
older versions which don't necessarily become the "best" version.
Then we could ask u
On 17-10-25 03:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 25/10/2017 2:23 PM, Shivaram Venkataraman wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> We have an R package that uses semantic versioning -- i.e. version
>> numbers
>> are of the form major_version.minor_version.patch_version
>>
>> One of the ways we use the patch_versio
On 25 October 2017 at 11:23, Shivaram Venkataraman wrote:
| Hello
|
| We have an R package that uses semantic versioning -- i.e. version numbers
| are of the form major_version.minor_version.patch_version
|
| One of the ways we use the patch_versions is to make maintenance releases
| or security
On 25/10/2017 2:23 PM, Shivaram Venkataraman wrote:
Hello
We have an R package that uses semantic versioning -- i.e. version numbers
are of the form major_version.minor_version.patch_version
One of the ways we use the patch_versions is to make maintenance releases
or security fixes that users c
10 matches
Mail list logo
