Hi Uwe,
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
Would you be willing to clarify/confirm the current situation regarding the
hosting of non-FOSS packages on CRAN, such as those with ACM or Creative
Commons license variants that have non-commercial use restrictions?
These are presently included in
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Ege Rubak wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> My two cents are below Marc's summary here:
>
> On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 20:33 -0400, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>> Right now, the interpretation, without further clarification from
>> CRAN, would be, it is ok for a package to be on CRAN
I do not want to make many general comments about licenses in public, as
this is a very difficult matter and I am not a lawyer.
But let me cite from the CRAN policies:
"Packages with licenses not listed at
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/share/licenses/license.db will
generally not be accep
Hi all,
My two cents are below Marc's summary here:
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 20:33 -0400, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> Right now, the interpretation, without further clarification from
> CRAN, would be, it is ok for a package to be on CRAN with license
> based usage restrictions included (e.g. for non-com
On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 22/10/2020 12:56 p.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> On Oct
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a package and getting a
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about licenses
>> and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, which I can't figure out
>>
On 22/10/2020 12:56 p.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a package and
On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about licenses
> and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, which I can't figure out
> how to fix.
>
> My package imports flowCore, which has an Artistic-2
It’s necessary but not sufficient to use a licence from license.db
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 3:12 am, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes <
On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about licenses
and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, w
On 22/10/2020 10:21 a.m., Kevin R. Coombes wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about
licenses and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, which I
can't figure out how to fix.
My package imports flowCore, which has an Artistic-2.0 license.
But flowCor
12 matches
Mail list logo
