to be okay with the new reading of the policy. (At
> least, the CRAN volunteers seem to accept packages which use this approach.)
>
> Best,
> Chris
>
>
> From: R-package-devel on behalf of
> Simon Urbanek
> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2023 6:14 PM
> To: Adam
w reading of the policy.
> (At least, the CRAN volunteers seem to accept packages which use this
> approach.)
>
> Best,
> Chris
>
>
> From: R-package-devel on behalf
> of Simon Urbanek
> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2023 6:14 PM
> To: Adam
> Cc: r-package-dev
rom: R-package-devel on behalf of
Simon Urbanek
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2023 6:14 PM
To: Adam
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cryptic error on Windows but not Debian
Adam,
no, it is your code in mm_authorize() that violates the CRAN policy, it is not
abo
Thank you so much for clarifying this.
Best,
Adam
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 6:14 PM Simon Urbanek
wrote:
> Adam,
>
> no, it is your code in mm_authorize() that violates the CRAN policy, it is
> not about the test. You may not touch user's .Renviron and there is no
> reason to resort to such dras
Adam,
no, it is your code in mm_authorize() that violates the CRAN policy, it is not
about the test. You may not touch user's .Renviron and there is no reason to
resort to such drastic measures. If you want to cache user's credentials, you
have to do it in a file located via tools::R_user_dir()
Thank you dearly, Simon, for pointing out the policy. May a test do the
following?
1. Save the user's original value for env var X.
2. Write a new value for env var X during a test.
3. Write back the original value for env var X at the end of the test.
An example:
test_that("mm_authorize() sets
Adam,
> On Nov 19, 2023, at 9:39 AM, Adam wrote:
>
> Dear Ivan,
>
> Thank you for explaining in such depth. I had not submitted to CRAN before.
> I will look into tools::R_user_dir().
>
> - May you point me toward the policy that the package should not edit
> .Renviron?
It is the policy yo
Dear Ivan,
Thank you for explaining in such depth. I had not submitted to CRAN before.
I will look into tools::R_user_dir().
- May you point me toward the policy that the package should not edit
.Renviron? I thought I was following best practices, but maybe things have
changed. For instance, this
В Fri, 17 Nov 2023 17:08:13 -0500
Adam пишет:
> 1. The example should not be running in the first place, as it has
> @examplesIf megamation:::mm_has_creds(), which should be FALSE for
> CRAN (it depends on env. variables)
The tarball I have fished from CRAN says version 0.2.0, but your GitHub
re
