Re: [R-pkg-devel] warnings by 3rd party headers

2020-01-17 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 20:42, Guido Kraemer wrote: > > Thanks, just to drive this a bit further: > > What if the headers then start producing some ugly compile warnings? Do > I have to fix these, too? How ugly? You can ignore "variable set but not used"-kind of stuff, but if things turn ugly enou

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warnings by 3rd party headers

2020-01-17 Thread Guido Kraemer
Thanks, just to drive this a bit further: What if the headers then start producing some ugly compile warnings? Do I have to fix these, too? On 1/16/20 5:12 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 16 January 2020 at 17:06, Iñaki Ucar wrote: | On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 16:58, Guido Kraemer wrote: | > |

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warnings by 3rd party headers

2020-01-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 16 January 2020 at 17:06, Iñaki Ucar wrote: | On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 16:58, Guido Kraemer wrote: | > | > I need to distribute some 3rd party headers with my package. The headers | > make R CMD check produce warnings: | > | > File which contains pragma(s) suppressing important diagnostics:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warnings by 3rd party headers

2020-01-16 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 16:58, Guido Kraemer wrote: > > I need to distribute some 3rd party headers with my package. The headers > make R CMD check produce warnings: > > File which contains pragma(s) suppressing important diagnostics: > ... > Files which contain pragma(s) suppressing di

[R-pkg-devel] warnings by 3rd party headers

2020-01-16 Thread Guido Kraemer
I need to distribute some 3rd party headers with my package. The headers make R CMD check produce warnings: File which contains pragma(s) suppressing important diagnostics: ... Files which contain pragma(s) suppressing diagnostics: ... There are some additional NOTEs on the use of `