On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 20:42, Guido Kraemer wrote:
>
> Thanks, just to drive this a bit further:
>
> What if the headers then start producing some ugly compile warnings? Do
> I have to fix these, too?
How ugly? You can ignore "variable set but not used"-kind of stuff,
but if things turn ugly enou
Thanks, just to drive this a bit further:
What if the headers then start producing some ugly compile warnings? Do
I have to fix these, too?
On 1/16/20 5:12 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 16 January 2020 at 17:06, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
| On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 16:58, Guido Kraemer wrote:
| >
|
On 16 January 2020 at 17:06, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
| On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 16:58, Guido Kraemer wrote:
| >
| > I need to distribute some 3rd party headers with my package. The headers
| > make R CMD check produce warnings:
| >
| > File which contains pragma(s) suppressing important diagnostics:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 16:58, Guido Kraemer wrote:
>
> I need to distribute some 3rd party headers with my package. The headers
> make R CMD check produce warnings:
>
> File which contains pragma(s) suppressing important diagnostics:
> ...
> Files which contain pragma(s) suppressing di
I need to distribute some 3rd party headers with my package. The headers
make R CMD check produce warnings:
File which contains pragma(s) suppressing important diagnostics:
...
Files which contain pragma(s) suppressing diagnostics:
...
There are some additional NOTEs on the use of `