On 8 February 2024 at 13:28, Marcin Jurek wrote:
| Ok, this makes sense! I saw that Rcpp was failing the checks too but I
| wasn't sure if I should resubmit or wait. Thanks!
For completeness, it was not caused by Rcpp but rather by a mix on new clang
and gcc versions which somehow got into each
Ok, this makes sense! I saw that Rcpp was failing the checks too but I
wasn't sure if I should resubmit or wait. Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ivan Krylov wrote:
> В Wed, 7 Feb 2024 08:40:44 -0600
> Marcin Jurek пишет:
>
> > Packages required but not available: 'Rcpp', 'FNN',
> > 'Rcpp
В Wed, 7 Feb 2024 08:40:44 -0600
Marcin Jurek пишет:
> Packages required but not available: 'Rcpp', 'FNN',
> 'RcppArmadillo' Packages suggested but not available for checking:
> 'fields', 'rmarkdown', 'testthat', 'maptools'
One of the machines running the incoming checks was having problems. If
Dear community,
I've been trying to submit an update to my GPvecchia package recently. This
morning I was notified that my package didn't pass incoming checks. When I
looked at the log this was the problem:
* checking package dependencies ... ERROR
Packages required but not available: 'sparseinv'