On 01.03.2018 18:40, Dason Kurkiewicz wrote:
They're just note NOTES. Although I don't like the names your functions
take because of the possibility to confuse with s3 if they have been in the
package as long as you say I don't see why this would be an issue. Just
send an explanation when you s
They're just note NOTES. Although I don't like the names your functions
take because of the possibility to confuse with s3 if they have been in the
package as long as you say I don't see why this would be an issue. Just
send an explanation when you submit and I don't think there should be any
issue
... bumping this in the hopes that someone has an answer ...
On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 10:35 -0600, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> I'm preparing a new release of PerformanceAnalytics, and as usual
> this brings the host of CRAN checks.
>
> I get this note:
>
> * checking S3 generic/method consistency ..
I'm preparing a new release of PerformanceAnalytics, and as usual this
brings the host of CRAN checks.
I get this note:
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... NOTE
Found the following apparent S3 methods exported but not registered:
mean.LCL mean.UCL mean.geometric mean.stderr
See section
