On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:54:51 -0500
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> I wonder if there's a way to define stubs for the macros in the
> package, and use mathjaxr versions only conditional on having it
> available?
I had an idea along the lines of
\Sexpr[results=rd]{if (...) '\\newcommand{\\mjeqn}{...}'}
On 22/01/2021 4:51 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi James,
On 22 January 2021 at 15:42, James Pustejovsky wrote:
| Thanks very much for your input! By "patch it out" do you mean modify my
| package description for the Debian distribution only? Would it work to
And code / content! Can't just a
Hi James,
On 22 January 2021 at 15:42, James Pustejovsky wrote:
| Thanks very much for your input! By "patch it out" do you mean modify my
| package description for the Debian distribution only? Would it work to
And code / content! Can't just alter the DESCRIPTION if the Rd still call
mathjaxr
Dirk,
Thanks very much for your input! By "patch it out" do you mean modify my
package description for the Debian distribution only? Would it work to
create a separate branch of my Github repo with modifications for the
Debian distro, and then submit that directly to Debian maintainers?
I'm sorry
Hi James,
On 22 January 2021 at 14:29, James Pustejovsky wrote:
| I'm writing to see if anyone has suggestions for how to handle an issue I'm
| facing with the clubSandwich package (
| https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich; Github repo:
| https://github.com/jepusto/clubSandwich). The p
Greetings,
I'm writing to see if anyone has suggestions for how to handle an issue I'm
facing with the clubSandwich package (
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich; Github repo:
https://github.com/jepusto/clubSandwich). The package documentation uses
the fairly new package mathjaxr (http
