It would be unusual these days to have pkg:ggplot as a dependency.
—
David.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 5, 2025, at 10:28 AM, Paul Angelo Manlapaz
> wrote:
>
> Dear Sir / Ma'am,
>
> Greetings.
>
> I am but a newbie in R Package development and currently, I am trying to
> submit my secon
See my response in the communication among you and CRAN.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.04.2025 08:40, Paul Angelo Manlapaz wrote:
Dear Sir / Ma'am,
Greetings.
I am but a newbie in R Package development and currently, I am trying to
submit my second package to CRAN and every time after submission,
Dear Sir / Ma'am,
Greetings.
I am but a newbie in R Package development and currently, I am trying to
submit my second package to CRAN and every time after submission, the
results for the pre-tests come back 'does not pass the incoming checks
automatically'.
The NOTE says;
Possibly misspelled
I appreciate the welcome! Also - I believe that replying to an email is the
way to respond here, but please let me know if that's not the case.
In any event - passing in a cluster context is an interesting idea. I will
think about that. Also, it seems that despite me telling myself to write
bug-fr
Dear Stephen Abrams,
Welcome to R-package-devel!
В Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:20:50 -0500
Stephen Abrams пишет:
> A secondary worry is that even if I resolve this, there might be
> something else causing threads to spin up.
Instead of using detectCores() [*] and creating cluster objects
yourself, how
Hi - my submission was rejected with the following error in one of my
vignettes.
On Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid:
Error: processing vignette 'modeling_with_binary_classifiers.Rmd'
failed with diagnostics:
24 simultaneous processes spawned
On Windows:
Error: processing vignette 'modeling_with_bin
mathjaxr maintainer here. Can you provide a minimal reproducible example
>illustrating the problem? If this is another case where the LaTeX command for
>Mathjax does not work directly for creating the pdf (or vice-versa), then I
>would
>like to document this (and a possible workar
roblem? If this is another case where the LaTeX command for
>Mathjax does not work directly for creating the pdf (or vice-versa), then I
>would
>like to document this (and a possible workaround) as was done here:
>
>https://github.com/wviechtb/mathjaxr#issues
>
>Best,
>Wolfg
github.com/wviechtb/mathjaxr#issues
Best,
Wolfgang
>-Original Message-
>From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf
>Of
>Marc Scherstjanoi
>Sent: Friday, 18 June, 2021 22:22
>To: r-package-devel@r-project.org
>Subject: [R-pkg-dev
g
>Subject: [R-pkg-devel] R package submission fails due to mathjaxr package
>
>Hi,
>
>I am about to sumbmit an R package.
>
>It passed the
>"R CMD check /package... --as-cran --no-manual"
>but not the
>"R CMD check /package... --as-cran".
>
>
Hi Mark,
I'm the maintainer of the 'metan' R package that uses mathjaxr. Please, be
sure you are declaring mathjaxr on 'Imports', not 'Suggest' field. In my
case, some time ago, I received an email from the CRAN team suggesting this
change. Please, let us know if this works!
Best,
Tiago
Em sex.,
t Professor
Department of Statistics
Department of Computer Science
University of Manitoba
maxturgeon.ca<http://maxturgeon.ca>
From: R-package-devel on behalf of Marc
Scherstjanoi
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 3:22 PM
To: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject
Hi,
I am about to sumbmit an R package.
It passed the
"R CMD check /package... --as-cran --no-manual"
but not the
"R CMD check /package... --as-cran".
Our way of presenting mathematical equations by using the mathjaxr package
seems to be not supported.
As a result, building pdf fails automa
Please resubmit, a hicc up on the check machine.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.12.2018 19:29, Michael Kellermann wrote:
Hi all,
I'm attempting to submit an update of our eiPack package to CRAN. When I
submitted it, it passed the Windows check with no problem (other than a
note for a change in mainta
Hi all,
I'm attempting to submit an update of our eiPack package to CRAN. When I
submitted it, it passed the Windows check with no problem (other than a
note for a change in maintainer), but it failed almost immediately on the
Debian check. The 00install.out file shows that it failed due to an
i
El lun., 1 oct. 2018 a las 14:45, Müller, Bernd
() escribió:
>
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> On Friday, I submitted my packae epos_0.1.0 via the web submission system
> https://cran.r-project.org/submit.html without any further errors, warnings,
> and notes except this one:
>
> * checking CRAN incomin
From the horse's mouth, via
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23829978/checking-cran-incoming-feasibility-note-maintainer
:
> According to CRAN Maintainer Uwe Ligges,
This is just a note that reminds CRAN maintainers to check that the
submission comes actually from his maintainer and n
Hi Bernd,
On 10/1/18 2:39 PM, Müller, Bernd wrote:
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: ‘Bernd Mueller ’
This NOTE is expected for a new package. It acts as a reminder to THE
CRAN team to look at the package manually.
Greetings
Ralf
--
Ralf Stubner
Senior Software Engi
It's normal and expected, and nothing to worry about. It's a NOTE to ensure
that the package comes from the designated maintainer.
See for instance:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23829978/checking-cran-incoming-feasibility-note-maintainer
Sarah
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:45 AM Müller, Bernd
Dear Sir or Madam,
On Friday, I submitted my packae epos_0.1.0 via the web submission system
https://cran.r-project.org/submit.html without any further errors, warnings,
and notes except this one:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Bernd Mueller ’
I don't know how to re
Also from the CRAN submission guidelines:
> If there are warnings or notes you cannot eliminate (for example
because you believe them to be spurious) send an explanatory note as
part of your covering email, or as a comment on the submission form.
This would apply to your spelling issues.
On
More important:
Checking should be performed on sources prepared by 'R CMD build'.
So at first prepare the sources via R CMD build and then check yourself
prior to submission following the CRAN policies. And *really* read that.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 27.09.2017 21:02, MTurgeon wrote:
Hi Yo
Hi Younathan,
You can ignore the first note: it simply says that this is a new package.
The second note highlights a few possible problems with your DESCRIPTION
file. It flags the word "Plasmode" as being possibly misspelled; if it
isn't, you can ignore the comment. Then it points out that the
Hi,
My name is Younathan and I am trying to submit it but every time it gives me
message that my package does not pass the incoming checks automatically and it
gives me 3 NOTES. I tried to fix them but I am unable to do so. If possible do
you know how to take care of the 3 Notes. The three note
24 matches
Mail list logo
