A hack that seems to work is (whitespace added for readability):
\newcommand{\Seqn}{
\ifelse{latex}{
\Sexpr[results=rd]{if (getRversion() < "4.2.2") "eqn{#1}" else
"eqn{#2}"}
}{
\ifelse{html}{
\Sexpr[results=rd]{if (getRversion() < "4.
On 2023-11-01 12:59 pm, Mikael Jagan wrote:
A hack that seems to work is (whitespace added for readability):
\newcommand{\Seqn}{
\ifelse{latex}{
\Sexpr[results=rd]{if (getRversion() < "4.2.2") "eqn{#1}" else
"eqn{#2}"}
}{
\ifelse{html
> Uwe Ligges
> on Wed, 1 Nov 2023 06:26:23 +0100 writes:
> On 01.11.2023 03:51, Mikael Jagan wrote:
>> Thanks. It seems that we were mistaken in our feeling (IIRC) that it
would
>> be "OK" to implicitly require '--no-manual' on versions of R from 3.5.0
to
>> 4.2.1,
On 01.11.2023 03:51, Mikael Jagan wrote:
Thanks. It seems that we were mistaken in our feeling (IIRC) that it would
be "OK" to implicitly require '--no-manual' on versions of R from 3.5.0 to
4.2.1, not changing our Depends.
We will fix this in Matrix 1.6-2, probably by conditionalizing or ot
Thanks. It seems that we were mistaken in our feeling (IIRC) that it would
be "OK" to implicitly require '--no-manual' on versions of R from 3.5.0 to
4.2.1, not changing our Depends.
We will fix this in Matrix 1.6-2, probably by conditionalizing or otherwise
replacing the amsmath commands and pr
Mikael,
in that case I think your requirements are wrong - Matrix says R >= 3.5.0 which
is apparently incorrect - from what you say it should be 4.2.2?. I can
certainly update to 4.2.3 if necessary.
Cheers,
Simon
> On 1/11/2023, at 9:19 AM, Mikael Jagan wrote:
>
> Thanks. We did see those
Thanks. We did see those ERRORs, stemming from use (since Matrix 1.6-0)
of amsmath commands in Rd files. These have been supported since R 4.2.2,
but r-oldrel-macos-* (unlike r-oldrel-windows-*) continues to run R 4.2.0.
My expectation was that those machines would begin running R >= 4.2.2 well
Mikael,
current Matrix fails checks on R-oldrel so that's why only the last working
version is installed:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Matrix.html
Cheers,
Simon
> On 1/11/2023, at 4:05 AM, Mikael Jagan wrote:
>
> I am guessing that they mean EdSurvey:
>
>https://
Re-sending to the list with correct subject line ...
I should undigest myself ...
Mikael
On 2023-10-31 11:05 am, Mikael Jagan wrote:
I am guessing that they mean EdSurvey:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_EdSurvey.html
Probably Matrix 1.6-1.1 is not installed on r-ol
Paul,
can you give us a bit more detail? Which package, which build and where you got
the errors? Older builds may not have the latest Matrix.
Cheers,
Simon
> On 31/10/2023, at 11:26 AM, Bailey, Paul via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer for a few packages, one of whi
Hi,
I'm the maintainer for a few packages, one of which is currently failing CRAN
checks on Mac OS because Matrix is not available in my required version (the
latest). I had to fix a few things due to changes in the latest Matrix package
because of how qr works and I thought, given the apparent
11 matches
Mail list logo
