vel@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] Literal LaTeX Text in Function Arguments
It seems that expansion of \ldots occurs in two different circumstances.
1) The Rd2XXX converters treat specially \ldots and \dots but in different
ways. tools::Rd2latex() defines in its body texify(), which, wh
of
\ldots here is due is due to the specific rendering for LaTeX, which replaces
\\ldots by three dots (...), and doesn't use my Rd definition for \ldots,
suggesting that this occurs at a different place.
Georgi Boshnakov
____
From: b...@denney.ws [b...@denney.ws]
Sent: 24 August 2019
M
To: b...@denney.ws; 'Georgi Boshnakov' ;
r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Literal LaTeX Text in Function Arguments
On 24/08/2019 7:35 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 23/08/2019 1:33 p.m., b...@denney.ws wrote:
>> Hi Georgi,
>>
>> Thanks for
= "continued ...", verbatim = NULL)
Mismatches in argument default values:
Name: 'bottom_border' Code: "\\hline" Docs: "\hline"
Name: 'subsequent_page_notification' Code: "continued \\ldots" Docs:
"continued ..."
Than
tches in argument default values:
Name: 'bottom_border' Code: "\\hline" Docs: "\hline"
Name: 'subsequent_page_notification' Code: "continued \\ldots" Docs:
"continued ..."
Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Georg
__
From: b...@denney.ws [b...@denney.ws]
Sent: 23 August 2019 18:33
To: Georgi Boshnakov; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] Literal LaTeX Text in Function Arguments
Hi Georgi,
Thanks for this pointer. My guess at this point is that I've found a bug
(or maybe a couple of
..", verbatim = NULL)
Mismatches in argument default values:
Name: 'bottom_border' Code: "\\hline" Docs: "\hline"
Name: 'subsequent_page_notification' Code: "continued \\ldots" Docs:
"continued ..."
Thanks,
Bill
-Original
\\hline", below_col_names = "hline",
subsequent_page_notification = "ldots continued",
latex_header = NULL)
--
Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-----
From: Georgi Boshnakov
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 9:52 AM
To: b...@denney.ws; r-package-devel@r-project.
uot;ldots continued",
latex_header = NULL)
--
Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Georgi Boshnakov
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 9:52 AM
To: b...@denney.ws; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] Literal LaTeX Text in Function Arguments
Rd is not La
: 23 August 2019 04:15
To: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: [R-pkg-devel] Literal LaTeX Text in Function Arguments
Hello,
Does anyone know how to include verbatim \ldots (and maybe other LaTeX) in
an .Rd file correctly?
When LaTeX is in the default arguments for a function, the code is
Hello,
Does anyone know how to include verbatim \ldots (and maybe other LaTeX) in
an .Rd file correctly?
When LaTeX is in the default arguments for a function, the code is
interpreted which makes the documentation not match the default formal
arguments.
An example is:
https://github.c
11 matches
Mail list logo
