Re: [R-pkg-devel] Issue of itemize in man file

2023-10-22 Thread J C Nash
Thanks. That seems to be the issue. Also vincent's suggestion of checkRd. JN On 2023-10-22 10:52, Ivan Krylov wrote: On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 10:43:08 -0400 J C Nash wrote: \itemize{ \item{fnchk OK;}{ \code{excode} = 0; \code{infeasible} = FALSE} The \

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Issue of itemize in man file

2023-10-22 Thread Vincent van Hees
I ran into the same issue last week with .Rd files that were previously accepted on CRAN and concluded that the package checks are becoming more critical about this aspect of Rd syntax, which is good. To reproduce the note outside R-devel and by that identify which files in your package are affect

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Issue of itemize in man file

2023-10-22 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 10:43:08 -0400 J C Nash wrote: >\itemize{ > \item{fnchk OK;}{ \code{excode} = 0; > \code{infeasible} = FALSE} The \item command inside \itemize{} lists doesn't take arguments. Did you mean \describe{} instead of \itemize{}? -- Best r

[R-pkg-devel] Issue of itemize in man file

2023-10-22 Thread J C Nash
I'm doing a major update of the optimx package and things were going relatively smoothly until this weekend when files that have passed win-builder gave NOTEs on r-devel for several manual (.Rd) files. The NOTE is of the form * checking Rd files ... NOTE checkRd: (-1) fnchk.Rd:40-41: Lost braces