On 21/07/2015 2:08 PM, Jennifer Bryan wrote:
> Sebastien: thanks for sharing the definitive solution!
>
> To the people on this list with the power to edit "Writing R Extensions":
>
> When a discussion here suggests a specific improvement, what is the best way
> for the community to propose a re
Sebastien: thanks for sharing the definitive solution!
To the people on this list with the power to edit "Writing R Extensions":
When a discussion here suggests a specific improvement, what is the best way
for the community to propose a revision? So that knowledge gets transferred
from this lis
Hi Jennifer,
Following your suggestions and after a couple of trial-and-error steps,
I believe the syntax is the following:
\code{\link[name_of_package:name_of_Rd_file]{alias_or_text}}
For instance, to link to panel.abline or strip.custom from the lattice
package, I used:
\code{\link[latti
Hi Sebastien,
This note about Rd warnings reminded me that I recently had the same problem.
So I recreated it and, I think, have found a solution.
I will explain in my specific example to be clear.
I need to link to the docs for the Token2.0 class from the httr package. First
thing you try:
\
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 13/07/2015 5:36 PM, Seth Wenchel wrote:
>> Are you exporting the functions from pkgB and pkgC? It's hard to tell from
>> your table below. The easiest way is to add a comment before each of the
>> functions in pkgB and pkgC that you want
Hi,
Thanks to your suggestions and those of other responders, I was able to
get rid of the warning messages returned during R CMD check.
However I am still confused by the .Rd file-related warnings I get when
we install the packages. For instance:
Rd warning: /tmp/some/path/man/pkgC_functio
On 15 July 2015 at 09:07, sbihorel wrote:
| I saw a few recent posts on topics related to mine (eg
| https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2015q3/000238.html). It
| looks like I need to import more packages in my NAMESPACE, correct?
Yes.
| However, I thought that imports would be rec
Hi Duncan,
So if the NAMESPACE of a package contains exportPattern("^[^\\.]"), does
this mean that only the functions created within the package are
exported and that the functions that were imported are not exported?
On 7/15/2015 9:24 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 15/07/2015 9:07 AM, sbihore
On 15/07/2015 9:07 AM, sbihorel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw a few recent posts on topics related to mine (eg
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2015q3/000238.html). It
> looks like I need to import more packages in my NAMESPACE, correct?
>
> However, I thought that imports would be recur
Hi,
I saw a few recent posts on topics related to mine (eg
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2015q3/000238.html). It
looks like I need to import more packages in my NAMESPACE, correct?
However, I thought that imports would be recursive, ie imports would
also get the info from depe
Hi,
Sorry about the table. It looked good when displayed using a fixed width
font. Let me try to linearize it:
* pkgA
o DESCRIPTION:
+ Depends: methods, lattice, grid, gam
+ Imports: Hmisc, survival
o NAMESPACE:
+ import: lattice, grid, gam, methods
On 13/07/2015 5:36 PM, Seth Wenchel wrote:
> Are you exporting the functions from pkgB and pkgC? It's hard to tell from
> your table below. The easiest way is to add a comment before each of the
> functions in pkgB and pkgC that you want to expose to the users.
>
> #' @export
> foo <- function(){.
Are you exporting the functions from pkgB and pkgC? It's hard to tell from
your table below. The easiest way is to add a comment before each of the
functions in pkgB and pkgC that you want to expose to the users.
#' @export
foo <- function(){...}
Then run roxygen::roxygenise() to build the NAMESP
Hi,
My group has recently upgraded from a fairly old R version (2.12) to the
R version 3.1.2. In parallel to this upgrade, I am updating our custom
packages to add functionality and also make them compliant to the
requirements of the new version of R. I would like to ask your help with
respect
14 matches
Mail list logo