> On 27 Oct 2024, at 23:03, Gianmarco Alberti
> wrote:
>
> Dear R Package Developers,
> I am seeking guidance regarding a situation with my package 'chisquare'
> (version 1.1) on CRAN.
>
> Current situation:
>
> 1. The package was submitted and (automatically) accepted to CRAN (version
> 1.
On 2024-10-28 12:56 p.m., Georgi Boshnakov wrote:
Also, v1.1 = v1.1.0:
package_version("1.1.0") > package_version("1.1")
[1] FALSE
package_version("1.1.0") == package_version("1.1")
[1] TRUE
If you adopt the 2-digit versions but decide to keep the possibility for
3-letter ones for mino
of
Joshua Ulrich
Sent: 28 October 2024 15:41
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: R Package Development
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] DESCRIPTION file corrections for accepted package
`R CMD check` uses the `package_version()` function to check that the submitted
package version is > the version on CRAN. You ca
`R CMD check` uses the `package_version()` function to check that the
submitted package version is > the version on CRAN. You can use it to
check Duncan's hypothesis:
R$ # current update with 3-part version
R$ package_version("1.1.1") > package_version("1.1")
[1] TRUE
R$ # next update with only a
I don't think R will enforce a 3 part version just because you used it
once. You might have other reasons to try to maintain versioning
consistency.
Duncan Murdoch
On 2024-10-27 7:48 a.m., Gianmarco Alberti wrote:
Dear Duncan,
Thank you for the straightforward guidance.
My initial query st
Dear Duncan,
Thank you for the straightforward guidance.
My initial query stemmed from a concern about versioning consistency - I
thought that once using three digits (1.1.1), I would need to maintain that
format (e.g., 1.2.0) in future updates. Your suggestion clarified that I
can use 1.1.1 for
On 2024-10-27 6:03 a.m., Gianmarco Alberti wrote:
Dear R Package Developers,
I am seeking guidance regarding a situation with my package 'chisquare'
(version 1.1) on CRAN.
Current situation:
1. The package was submitted and (automatically) accepted to CRAN (version
1.1) after thorough local tes
Dear R Package Developers,
I am seeking guidance regarding a situation with my package 'chisquare'
(version 1.1) on CRAN.
Current situation:
1. The package was submitted and (automatically) accepted to CRAN (version
1.1) after thorough local testing and complete devtools checks
(check_win_oldrele
