Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-15 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 15:43, Goldfeld, Keith wrote: > So - even though I am getting the same note: > > Compilation used the following non-portable flag(s): > > from Ubuntu Linux, I should go ahead and submit? Definitely. Iñaki __ R-package-devel@r-pr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-15 Thread Goldfeld, Keith
Eddelbuettel; r-package-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag" You don't need to do anything. Gabor On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:13 PM Goldfeld, Keith wrote: > > Forgive me for not completely understanding the back and forth. Do I need to

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-15 Thread Gábor Csárdi
de? > > > - Keith > > > From: R-package-devel on behalf of > Iñaki Ucar > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 9:01:31 AM > To: Dirk Eddelbuettel > Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable fl

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-15 Thread Goldfeld, Keith
: Dirk Eddelbuettel Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag" On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 13:16, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > > On 15 May 2019 at 11:49, G�bor Cs�rdi wrote: > | Thinking about this a bit more, I think th

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-15 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 13:16, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > > On 15 May 2019 at 11:49, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > | Thinking about this a bit more, I think this might be a bug in R CMD > | check, actually. > | > | I understand that these flags are not portable, and yes, they should > | be reported if th

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 15 May 2019 at 11:49, Gábor Csárdi wrote: | Thinking about this a bit more, I think this might be a bug in R CMD | check, actually. | | I understand that these flags are not portable, and yes, they should | be reported if they are specified in the packages's Makevars* files. | But in this cas

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-15 Thread Gábor Csárdi
Thinking about this a bit more, I think this might be a bug in R CMD check, actually. I understand that these flags are not portable, and yes, they should be reported if they are specified in the packages's Makevars* files. But in this case they are coming from the Ubuntu system's Makevars setup,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-10 Thread Goldfeld, Keith
That definitely makes it easy. Thanks. -Original Message- From: R-package-devel On Behalf Of Ralf Stubner Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 4:41 PM To: r-package-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag" On 10.05.19 22:32, Goldfeld, K

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 May 2019 at 20:32, Goldfeld, Keith wrote: | Good afternoon – | | I am submitting an update to my package ‘simstudy’, and the ran the rhub checks. I received a note from one of the four platforms (the other three passed). The Ubuntu Linux 16.04 objected to the compilation flags: | | * ch

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-10 Thread Ralf Stubner
On 10.05.19 22:32, Goldfeld, Keith wrote: > I am submitting an update to my package ‘simstudy’, and the ran the rhub > checks. I received a note from one of the four platforms (the other three > passed). The Ubuntu Linux 16.04 objected to the compilation flags: > > * checking compilation flags u

[R-pkg-devel] Compilation used the "non-portable flag"

2019-05-10 Thread Goldfeld, Keith
Good afternoon – I am submitting an update to my package ‘simstudy’, and the ran the rhub checks. I received a note from one of the four platforms (the other three passed). The Ubuntu Linux 16.04 objected to the compilation flags: * checking compilation flags used ... NOTE Compilation used the