Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

On 29.03.19 17:05, William Dunlap wrote: > It looks like it is not boost but RcppEigen that has the call to > std::rand() that volesti/src/rotating.cpp contains. > > RcppEigen/include/Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h: > static inline Scalar run(const Scalar& x, const Scalar& y) > { > return

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

of the >>> NOTE, wouldn't RcppEigen also get the same NOTE? However, it does not: >>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RcppEigen.html >>> >>> And for what it's worth, neither does BH: >>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

.org/web/checks/check_results_BH.html > > Max > -- > *From:* R-package-devel on behalf > of William Dunlap > *Sent:* March 29, 2019 12:05 PM > *To:* Vissarion Fisikopoulos > *Cc:* R Package Development > *Subject:* Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review > > It looks like it

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

ran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_BH.html >> >> Max >> -- >> *From:* R-package-devel on >> behalf of William Dunlap >> *Sent:* March 29, 2019 12:05 PM >> *To:* Vissarion Fisikopoulos >> *Cc:* R Package Development >

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

On 29.03.19 17:27, Maxime Turgeon wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something, but if RcppEigen were the cause of the NOTE, > wouldn't RcppEigen also get the same NOTE? However, it does not: > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RcppEigen.html > > And for what it's worth, neither does B

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

project.org/web/checks/check_results_BH.html Max From: R-package-devel on behalf of William Dunlap Sent: March 29, 2019 12:05 PM To: Vissarion Fisikopoulos Cc: R Package Development Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review It looks like it is not boost but RcppEigen th

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

nate. I just >> > had a look around at ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/ and your >> > package is not there anymore. Just a wild guess but I wonder if your >> > email reply back to CRAN ends up in their spam folders? >> > >> > BTW, what are the two NOTEs

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

walk an extra mile just avoid NOTEs in my > > packages even if I know they're false positives. > > > > My $.02 > > > > /Henrik > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:28 AM Vissarion Fisikopoulos > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > &

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

.." and then the email on > > automated check complaining about the same 2 notes as in the previous > > submission. I answered (reply to all) explaining why those notes are > > false positives. Then no news for 9 days. Could you please update us > > on this. > > > &g

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

os > > > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:05, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel < > > r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > > From: "Maëlle SALMON" > > > To: Dunc

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

rdoch , Henrik Bengtsson < > > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com> > > Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org > > Bcc: > > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC) > > Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review > > Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

Duncan Murdoch , Henrik Bengtsson < > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com> > Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC) > Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review > Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly): > https://itsaloc

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

--- Begin Message --- Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly): https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard Den onsdag 13 mars 2019 08:54:00 CET, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel skrev: We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on the FTP

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

--- Begin Message --- We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on the FTP server CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays | | | | CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays | | | We hope it makes data more accessible whilst reducing load on the FTP server. Maëlle. Den tis

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

My fault as I habe not spotted that. Can you pls resubmit as we do no longer have your original submission yet? Best, Uwe Ligges On 13.03.2019 00:10, Τόλης Χαλκής wrote: The name of the package is "volesti". Both checks returned two Notes and we "replied to all" to the e-mail  in order to ex

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

The name of the package is "volesti". Both checks returned two Notes and we "replied to all" to the e-mail in order to explain why we believe it were both false positives. Best, Chalkis Apostolos On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 00:27, Uwe Ligges wrote: > Not normal, if you tell us which package you are

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

Not normal, if you tell us which package you are talking about, the CRAN team can check what happened in case you did not simply forget to confirm your submission. Best, Uwe Ligges On 12.03.2019 21:30, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP serve

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server: ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/ /Henrik On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of Februar

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote: Dear all, We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got a positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this normal? Is there any way to get informed for the review process? Did you get the two message

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

Sounds like it fell through the cracks somewhere. The foghorn package is a convenient way to check on CRAN status. On 2019-03-12 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote: > Dear all, > > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

Dear all, We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got a positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this normal? Is there any way to get informed for the review process? Best regards, -Chalkis Apostolos [[alternative HTML version delete