egy that I should try, please let me know.
Thanks,
Reed
[1] https://github.com/reedacartwright/rbedrock
[2] https://cran.r-project.org/package=rbedrock
[3]
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/12.x/libcxx/include/any#L107-L116
--
Reed A. Cartwright, PhD
Associate Professor of Life Scie
I think this is the same group that advertised an R package template a
while back that also clearly didn't follow R-exts rules or use any of
the best practices mentioned on this mailing list.
https://github.com/stsds/Template-Rcpp
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 3:24 PM Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> I had a
If I have read the R's change log correctly, C99 printf format is now
supported on Windows. I think the change was made in the last week.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023, 13:01 Henrik Bengtsson
wrote:
> "%td" is not supported on all platforms/compilers. This is what I got
> when I added it to 'matrixStats
If you want to future proof your code, the first or third is the way to go.
However, I prefer '%td' for readability. If R ever changes how R_xlen_t is
defined, I assume the checks will alert me to the need to change the format
string.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023, 12:12 Hugh Parsonage wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi Ivan,
Interesting package, and I'll provide more feedback later. For a
comparison, I'd recommend looking at how GNU make does parallel processing.
It uses the concept of job server and job slots. What I like about it is
that it is implemented at the OS level because make needs to support
intera
that it's a mismatch of run-times between the
> cmake build and the R linking, but from the package alone it's not clear to
> me why.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2023, at 3:51 PM, Reed A. Cartwright
> wrote:
>
> Update: I submitted a new version of
Also the most recent source code tested by CRAN is here:
https://github.com/reedacartwright/rbedrock/tree/v0.3.1
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:51 PM Reed A. Cartwright
wrote:
> Update: I submitted a new version of the package, but it did not fix the
> issue. The package has now been archived
I'd appreciate it.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:54 PM Reed A. Cartwright
wrote:
> Is there any way to submit packages directly to the CRAN's clang17 setup?
> I can enable verbose output for CMake and compare the output, but I'd
> rather not clog up the CRAN incoming queue
t is quite different from the gannet tests-clang-trunk setup (also
> note the different library paths), but that's not something you can do
> universally in the package, because it strongly depends on the toolchain
> setup.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> > On 28/09/2023, a
ackage:
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/r-hub/rhub2*readme__;Iw!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!a5vkX68B5unua6_Zsh92b99AXfbJiewU7Mp0nqAKE0JDT8v3g2d08JZ8Yq_0ubp0j4GeTWWLjLVAN-FoxPbUQlE$
>
> Gabor
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 8:29 PM Reed A. Cartwright
> wrote:
> >
> &
ing according to the log.
Has anyone seen this before and know where I should start looking to fix it?
Thanks.
--
Reed A. Cartwright, PhD
Associate Professor of Genomics, Evolution, and Bioinformatics
School of Life Sciences and The Biodesign Institute
Arizona State University
==
I've been lurking on this discussion and have a question.
What does data.table do to pass CRAN tests? If this is a problem for
packages that use data.table, then it certainly is a problem for data.table
itself.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 3:46 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 25/08/2023 6:13 p.m., Tob
Dirk,
I'm curious why you chose to call cmake from make instead of from
configure. I've always seen cmake as part of the configure step of package
building.
Thanks,
Reed
On Thu, May 11, 2023, 04:17 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 11 May 2023 at 09:02, Martin Maechler wrote:
> | I've been told
plete example script that includes all the bells and
whistles needed to get CMake running with R.
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 1:45 PM Reed A. Cartwright
wrote:
> I use the following logic in my configure script to detect cmake on the
> MacOS builders:
>
> https://github.com/reedacartwr
I use the following logic in my configure script to detect cmake on the
MacOS builders:
https://github.com/reedacartwright/rbedrock/blob/master/configure#L39-L49
I can't remember which package I borrowed this logic from. But it would be
nice if "Writing R Extensions" would expand their cmake sect
I'm rethinking the interface of a package, specifically how external binary
data is formatted for use in R. I can't decide if it is better to use
attributes to store metadata or use a list to hold the main data and
metadata as separate elements.
Here's is what one datatype currently looks like:
L
What is the proper way to indicate that a package submitted to CRAN
requires the gcc compiler on Solaris? I haven't been able to find any
information about how to indicate that in a way that the CRAN builders will
pick up on it.
--
Reed A. Cartwright, PhD
Associate Professor of Gen
If my submission is no longer visible using foghorn::cran_incoming(), that
means it has expired and I should resubmit, right?
--
Reed A. Cartwright, PhD
Associate Professor of Genomics, Evolution, and Bioinformatics
School of Life Sciences and The Biodesign Institute
Arizona State University
I'm also waiting several weeks for an update to be approved or sent back to
me.
In the meantime, the package has been archived by CRAN because the update
--- which fixes issues identified by CRAN --- hasn't been approved yet.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:44 AM Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>Wondering a
19 matches
Mail list logo
