AN.
Cheers,
Chris
From: Duncan Murdoch
Sent: Sunday, 6 April 2025 11:03 PM
To: Chris Brien ; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Unreproducible error for CRAN submission on
winbuilder using r-devel
On 2025-04-06 4:08 a.m., Chris Brien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I su
Hi all,
I submitted my package asremlPlus 4.4.47 to CRAN on Thurs 3/04/2025 and it
generated an Error (and a NOTE) on Winbuilder using R version 4.5.0 RC
(2025-04-04 r88102 ucrt):
package asremlPlus_4.4.47.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tes
Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: Note_to_CRAN_maintainers
Maintainer: 'Chris Brien mailto:chris.br...@adelaide.edu.au'
Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: examples, Result: NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
user s
I have chosen a file.
Thanks very much for your help. All's well that ends well.
Cheers,
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Krylov
> Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2023 8:45 AM
> To: Chris Brien
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-p
t; Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2023 12:37 AM
> To: Chris Brien
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Failed CRAN tar.gz upload to CRAN
>
> CAUTION: External email. Only click on links or open attachments from
> trusted senders.
>
> В Fri, 13 Jan
as to what is causing the problem. Can anyone throw any lot on
what the problem might be?
Thanks in advance,
Cheers,
Chris
Chris Brien | Senior Biostatistician
Australian Plant Phenomics Facility
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
PM
To: Chris Brien; 'r-package-devel@r-project.org'
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] update.formula does not keep.order
CAUTION: External email. Only click on links or open attachments from trusted
senders.
On 27/10/2021 7:16 p.m., Chris Brien wrote:
> Hi listers,
>
>
>
> I
Hi listers,
I have a package asremlPlus on CRAN that manipulates formulae. It uses the
keep.order argument, as in the stats::terms function, to allow control over the
order of terms in a model.
However, when stats::update.formula is used to update a formula, there is no
keep.order argument
arity with
r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 and submit anyway?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Cheers,
Chris Brien
Adjunct Associate Professor in Statistics
-
School of Information Technology & Mathematical Sciences
University of South Australia
GPO Box 2471
ADELAIDE 5001 South Au
[mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de]
Sent: Monday, 4 March 2019 7:16 PM
To: Chris Brien; 'r-package-devel@r-project.org'
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] License note on CRAN submission
On 04.03.2019 05:34, Chris Brien wrote:
> I recently submitted an updated version of my package asremlPlu
2008 r-devel
and Fedora linux, r-devel, clang was as follows:
-
License components with restrictions and base license permitting such:
MIT + file LICENSE
File 'LICENSE':
YEAR: 2019
COPYRIGHT HOLDER: CHRIS BRIEN
Suggests or Enhances not in mainstream repositories:
asreml
4.1-21 of the package
to CRAN and this generated the following NOTE:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Chris Brien '
License components with restrictions and base license permitting such:
MIT + file LICENSE
File 'LICENSE':
YEAR: 2018-2019
COP
contents
%\VignetteIndexEntry{Wheat data: a spatial analysis example}
%\VignetteEngine{R.rsp::asis}
%\VignetteAuthor{Chris Brien}
%\VignetteKeyword{asremlPlus}
I have the following lines in the DESCRIPTION file:
Suggests: testthat, lattice, emmeans, lmerTest, pbkrtest, R.rsp
Enhances: asreml
take.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Martyn Plummer [mailto:plumm...@iarc.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2018 4:20 AM
To: Chris Brien; e...@debian.org; murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licensing of an R package
On Tue, 2018
packages.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Martyn Plummer [mailto:plumm...@iarc.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 January 2018 4:26 AM
To: Chris Brien; e...@debian.org; murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licensing of an R package
On Fri
ehalf Of Dirk
Eddelbuettel
Sent: Saturday, 20 January 2018 2:30 AM
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: Chris Brien; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licensing of an R package
Chris,
I am with Duncan here.
You can license _your_ package any way you want and prefer. I like GPL.
You se
library needs to be known, and the
desired behavior needs to be permitted.
Regards,
Brian
On 01/19/2018 04:19 AM, Chris Brien wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Here are the answers:
>
> A) No, I am simply calling routines.
> B) By proprietary I mean that it is a commercial package.
To: Chris Brien
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licensing of an R package
Chris,
you've not said what *you* would like the license for your software to do. You
could release the software under a "public domain", "no rights reserved" style
li
that `foo' is not.
Thanks for your interest.
Cheers,
Chris
From: stefan.mckinnon.edwa...@gmail.com
[mailto:stefan.mckinnon.edwa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stefan McKinnon
Høj-Edwards
Sent: Friday, 19 January 2018 7:58 PM
To: Chris Brien
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R
issues can suggest a license type that might be suitable for `foo' such that at
least the enhancements that it incorporates remain `free'?
Cheers,
Chris Brien
Adjunct Senior Lecturer in Statistics
-
Phenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre
University of South Australia
GPO
Dear all,
I had realized that they were internal functions.
However, I was conjecturing that the maintainer intends for them to be employed
by package users and that use of the ':::' operator might be acceptable in
these circumstances.
It appears not and I have modified my package to remove a
[mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 16 December 2017 10:18 PM
To: Chris Brien; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem enhancing a package with a predict method
not declared to be an S3 method
On 15/12/2017 11:52 PM, Chris Brien wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
are 21 sets of
tests.
The manifest problem is "ie", which is another unexported function in asreml,
apparently called by predict.asreml.
Has anyone on this list advice to offer on how this problem might be overcome?
Any help gratefully received,
Chris Brien, University of South Aust
n rhub with the same result.
I have reached a dead-end in that I do not know how I can get any further
information that would help to identify the problem.
Any suggestions as to how I might proceed towards a solution to this problem?
Cheers,
Chris Brien
Adjunct Senior Lecturer in S
24 matches
Mail list logo
