On 28 July 2024 at 15:44, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 2024-07-28 1:48 p.m., Josiah Parry wrote:
| > However, if plots are generated in the process, the plots are stored in
| > Rplots.pdf.
| >
| > Is there a way via command line arguments to change the name of the pdf
| > output.
| >
| > There mi
On 2024-07-28 4:05 p.m., Josiah Parry wrote:
Thanks, Duncan!
Is there a way to override this using the command line arguments?
I assume you could do that using commandArgs() in the dev.new() call,
but I don't use BATCH.
I'd like to be able to have a generalizable way to address this without
Dirk Eddelbuettel would tell you to use his 'little r' script instead,
though not sure if it has this particular flexibility. You could wrap R CMD
BATCH in your own script that moved Rplots.pdf where you wanted it ...
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024, 4:05 PM Josiah Parry wrote:
> Thanks, Duncan!
>
> Is the
Thanks, Duncan!
Is there a way to override this using the command line arguments?
I'd like to be able to have a generalizable way to address this without
having to modify R source code.
My understanding is that when there is a plot output, R CMD BATCH uses the
PDF device which is a fair default.
On 2024-07-28 1:48 p.m., Josiah Parry wrote:
Hey folks! I am working with R CMD BATCH and providing a providing a
logfile output e.g.
R CMD BATCH main.R 2024-07-28.log
This creates the desired log file with the contents of stdout and stderr.
However, if plots are generated in the process, the
Hey folks! I am working with R CMD BATCH and providing a providing a
logfile output e.g.
R CMD BATCH main.R 2024-07-28.log
This creates the desired log file with the contents of stdout and stderr.
However, if plots are generated in the process, the plots are stored in
Rplots.pdf.
Is there a way
