All this makes sense, thanks for your tips, everyone!
Marcin
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:44 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 9 February 2024 at 08:59, Marcin Jurek wrote:
> | I recently submitted an update to my package. It previous version relied
> on
> | Boost for Bessel and gamma functions bu
On 9 February 2024 at 08:59, Marcin Jurek wrote:
| I recently submitted an update to my package. It previous version relied on
| Boost for Bessel and gamma functions but a colleague pointed out to me that
| they are included in the standard library beginning with the C++17
| standard.
There is a
Your users may also use old versions of clang. Hence please correct it.
CRAN is also checking with the clang18 release candidate.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 09.02.2024 15:59, Marcin Jurek wrote:
Dear community,
I recently submitted an update to my package. It previous version relied on
Boost for Be
Not really responding the question, however another way could be to
consider if your code is in Rcpp and calls to bessel and gamma function
are not very frequent. These functions are available in base R and as
such are callable via Function():
> Rcpp::evalCpp('Function("besselK")(1., 0.2)')
[1
Dear community,
I recently submitted an update to my package. It previous version relied on
Boost for Bessel and gamma functions but a colleague pointed out to me that
they are included in the standard library beginning with the C++17
standard.
I don't have access to a Mac so I tested my package
