On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 05:34:26 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 19/10/2023 8:17 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
> >
> > In a package that I maintain, there are examples, in the *.Rd files,
> > that take an excruciatingly long time to run. This makes package
> > checking extremely tedious. There is no
В Thu, 19 Oct 2023 05:57:54 +
"Helske, Jouni" пишет:
> But I just realised that bssm uses Armadillo via RcppArmadillo, which
> uses OpenMP by default for some elementwise operations. So, I wonder
> if that could be the culprit?
I wasn't able to reproduce the NOTE either, despite manually set
On 19 October 2023 at 05:57, Helske, Jouni wrote:
| I am having difficulties in getting the latest version of the bssm
(https://github.com/helske/bssm) package to CRAN, as the pretest issues a NOTE
that the package uses too many cores in some of the examples ("Examples with
CPU time > 2.5 time
On 19/10/2023 8:17 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
In a package that I maintain, there are examples, in the *.Rd files,
that take an excruciatingly long time to run. This makes package
checking extremely tedious. There is no question of errors being
thrown from these examples, they are simply time co
Hi,
I am having difficulties in getting the latest version of the bssm
(https://github.com/helske/bssm) package to CRAN, as the pretest issues a NOTE
that the package uses too many cores in some of the examples ("Examples with
CPU time > 2.5 times elapsed time"). I've seen plenty of discussion
