Re: [R-pkg-devel] possible solution to package-documentation-alias problem

2023-08-19 Thread Duncan Murdoch
When you get a note from CRAN, remember that it ignores Roxygen comments completely. It's just looking at the files that Roxygen produces. So you should look at the .Rd files when you get a complaint about them. Your previous code would have produced a file named plan.Rd, and that file didn'

Re: [R-pkg-devel] possible solution to package-documentation-alias problem

2023-08-19 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
Thanks Dan. Also see: https://r-pkgs.org/man.html#sec-man-package-doc My understanding is that literally thousands of packages are broken in the same way. -Roy > On Aug 19, 2023, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kelley wrote: > > # Preamble > > This email is to tell other developers what I did to addres

[R-pkg-devel] possible solution to package-documentation-alias problem

2023-08-19 Thread Daniel Kelley
# Preamble This email is to tell other developers what I did to address an issue with documenting a package. I'm not sure that I am correct in my approach -- comments would definitely be appreciated -- but at least this email is fairly concrete about the changes I made. To be honest, I don't know