Re: [R-pkg-devel] gdb availability on r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc

2023-08-13 Thread Simon Urbanek
> On 14/08/2023, at 5:25 AM, Jamie Lentin wrote: > > Thanks both! > > On 2023-08-12 23:52, Uwe Ligges wrote: >> On 12.08.2023 23:19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >>> On 12 August 2023 at 18:12, Uwe Ligges wrote: >>> | On 12.08.2023 15:10, Jamie Lentin wrote: >>> | > The system call in question is

Re: [R-pkg-devel] status of "possibly invalid URL/403 error" NOTEs?

2023-08-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 13.08.2023 22:57, Avraham Adler wrote: I had a similar issue with a paper on JSTOR. Usually CRAN let it through. However, I eventually switched from URL to DOI and now the user needs to find the free source so to rid myself of the constant hassle. CRAN really doesn’t like redirects. I gu

Re: [R-pkg-devel] status of "possibly invalid URL/403 error" NOTEs?

2023-08-13 Thread Avraham Adler
I had a similar issue with a paper on JSTOR. Usually CRAN let it through. However, I eventually switched from URL to DOI and now the user needs to find the free source so to rid myself of the constant hassle. CRAN really doesn’t like redirects. I guess you could wrap it in \code{} so as not to h

[R-pkg-devel] status of "possibly invalid URL/403 error" NOTEs?

2023-08-13 Thread Ben Bolker
I have a package whose documentation includes the reference \doi{10.1137/18M1186411} which redirects here: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/18M1186411 Running R CMD check --as-cran on the package gives Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs: URL: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/18

Re: [R-pkg-devel] gdb availability on r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc

2023-08-13 Thread Jamie Lentin
Thanks both! On 2023-08-12 23:52, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 12.08.2023 23:19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 12 August 2023 at 18:12, Uwe Ligges wrote: | On 12.08.2023 15:10, Jamie Lentin wrote: | > The system call in question is done by the TMB package[2], and not ours | > to tinker with: | > | >

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Examples are too long in computation for CRAN

2023-08-13 Thread Ivan Krylov
В Sun, 13 Aug 2023 00:59:40 -0700 Michael Topper пишет: >- Setting the nthreads argument to 2 in fixest::feels() in case > this is the problem as suggested. Any chance you could be hitting some other code paths in the fixest package while working on the objects returned by fixest::feols()?

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Examples are too long in computation for CRAN

2023-08-13 Thread Michael Topper
I have tried the following: - Trimming down the examples substantially to only run 1 regression per-function. - Setting the nthreads argument to 2 in fixest::feels() in case this is the problem as suggested. - Tried to use skip_cran_test() on the tests that include fixest regress