On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 6:44 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 06/02/2023 3:46 p.m., Winston Chang wrote:
> > I recently submitted a package to CRAN with "SystemRequirements: C++11".
> > This raises the following NOTE on R-devel, and I was asked to fix and
> > resubmit:
> >
> > * checking C++ specific
On 06/02/2023 3:46 p.m., Winston Chang wrote:
I recently submitted a package to CRAN with "SystemRequirements: C++11".
This raises the following NOTE on R-devel, and I was asked to fix and
resubmit:
* checking C++ specification ... NOTE
Specified C++11: please update to current default of C++
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:10 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 00:09, Avraham Adler wrote:
> >
> > "If a package does have a src/Makevars[.win] file then also setting
> > the make variable ‘CXX_STD’ there is recommended,"
>
> That doesn't refer to the SystemRequirements field.
>
> Iñ
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 00:09, Avraham Adler wrote:
>
> "If a package does have a src/Makevars[.win] file then also setting
> the make variable ‘CXX_STD’ there is recommended,"
That doesn't refer to the SystemRequirements field.
Iñaki
>
> Avi
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:58 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
"If a package does have a src/Makevars[.win] file then also setting
the make variable ‘CXX_STD’ there is recommended,"
Avi
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:58 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 23:27, Avraham Adler wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:46 PM Duncan Murdoch
> > wrote:
>
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 23:27, Avraham Adler wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:46 PM Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/02/2023 4:01 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > > On 06/02/2023 3:46 p.m., Winston Chang wrote:
> > >> I recently submitted a package to CRAN with "SystemRequirements: C++11".
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:46 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2023 4:01 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > On 06/02/2023 3:46 p.m., Winston Chang wrote:
> >> I recently submitted a package to CRAN with "SystemRequirements: C++11".
> >> This raises the following NOTE on R-devel, and I was asked to
В Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:46:16 -0600
Winston Chang пишет:
> 1. Remove "SystemRequirements: C++11" entirely. The problem with this
> is that on systems with older versions of R (3.6 and below, I
> believe), it may try to compile the package with an older C++
> standard, which will fail.
> 2. Update it
On 06/02/2023 4:01 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 06/02/2023 3:46 p.m., Winston Chang wrote:
I recently submitted a package to CRAN with "SystemRequirements: C++11".
This raises the following NOTE on R-devel, and I was asked to fix and
resubmit:
* checking C++ specification ... NOTE
Specifi
On 06/02/2023 3:46 p.m., Winston Chang wrote:
I recently submitted a package to CRAN with "SystemRequirements: C++11".
This raises the following NOTE on R-devel, and I was asked to fix and
resubmit:
* checking C++ specification ... NOTE
Specified C++11: please update to current default of C++
I recently submitted a package to CRAN with "SystemRequirements: C++11".
This raises the following NOTE on R-devel, and I was asked to fix and
resubmit:
* checking C++ specification ... NOTE
Specified C++11: please update to current default of C++17
If I understand correctly, I have two options
As complement to Duncan's nice answer I also suggest to use the function
.Deprecated() for an additional transition time.
(see eg
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44622054/mark-a-function-as-deprecated-in-customised-r-package)
Baseline, if other people/packages use your package, alert them (v
12 matches
Mail list logo
