On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:07:28 -0400
Andrew Simmons wrote:
> This issue isn't related to RStudio.
>
> The issue is that you're exporting an object without providing any
> documentation for it. It sounds like you don't want to export it, so
> you need to go to your NAMESPACE file and remove the p
Paul,
I wouldn't worry about oldrel - that's likely an incomplete run (I don't see
that error anymore), but I would worry about the failure on R-release:
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-release-macos-arm64/EdSurvey-00check.html
You can always check with the Mac Builder before you submi
This issue isn't related to RStudio.
The issue is that you're exporting an object without providing any
documentation for it. It sounds like you don't want to export it, so you
need to go to your NAMESPACE file and remove the part was export(r2). If
you do want to export it, then you need to docum
Hi there,
I am writing to aks your help for an issuue arising when I am writing my R
package using R studio 1.2.1335 as follows.
``checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING
Undocumented code objects:
'r2'
All user-level objects in a package should have documentation entries."
The f
Hi,
One of my CRAN packages gets an ARM-64 build fail, visible at
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-oldrel-macos-arm64/EdSurvey-00check.html
It ends:
checking replacement functions ... OK
checking foreign function calls ...
It looks like someone tripped over the power chord,
It might be easier to help you if you show us your package by
publishing the source code somewhere.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 22:22:48 +0400
"Jahajeeah, Havisha" wrote:
> CIvalue2: no visible global function definition for 'qt'
> andgm11: no visible binding for global variable 'ParticleSwarm'
> andgm1
Hello,
are you aware of https://win-builder.r-project.org/? It'll allow you
to validate that your package passes all the requirements before
submitting it to CRAN.
My $.02
/Henrik
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:23 AM Jahajeeah, Havisha
wrote:
>
> Dear team,
>
> My second attempt at submitting the
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:50:01 -0700
Edward Wei wrote:
> 1. Where do I run "make check"?
In the directory where R is built from source. If you're using a binary
build of R, this isn't applicable.
> 3. I get this back when I run the "tools::testInstalledPackages(scope
> = "base")" on my RGUI.
>
>
Dear team,
My second attempt at submitting the package GreymodelsPackage_1.0.tar.gz to
CRAN.
Grateful if you could please assist me with the following issues:
CIvalue2: no visible global function definition for 'qt'
andgm11: no visible binding for global variable 'ParticleSwarm'
andgm11: no visi
So I am looking at the R Installation and Administration section,
specifically section 3 for windows. . I have some inquiries.
1. Where do I run "make check"?
2. I got this when I was running the make check:
C:\Users\edmon\Documents\R\RFIN> R CMD make check
make: *** No rule to make target 'check'
On 26.09.2022 17:14, Jahajeeah, Havisha wrote:
Dear team,
I have submitted the package GreymodelsPackage_1.0.tar.gz to CRAN and it's
a shiny app.
However, I received the following
* using log directory
'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/GreymodelsPackage.Rcheck'
* using R Under development
В Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:14:04 +0400
"Jahajeeah, Havisha" пишет:
> * checking extension type ... ERROR
> Extensions with Type 'Shiny application' cannot be checked.
Since you're writing a package, you can either specify Type: Package in
the DESCRIPTION file, or omit the field entirely:
https://cran
Dear team,
I have submitted the package GreymodelsPackage_1.0.tar.gz to CRAN and it's
a shiny app.
However, I received the following
* using log directory
'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/GreymodelsPackage.Rcheck'
* using R Under development (unstable) (2022-09-25 r82916 ucrt)
* using platform
13 matches
Mail list logo
