Hello, All:
Two questions:
1. Might anyone have any thoughts on posting an RMarkdown
vignette like an appendix to an article on Wikiversity?
2. In particular, might it be feasible to post a link to an
online RStudio instance that could be provided with the RMarkdow
On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 22/10/2020 12:56 p.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> On Oct
Thanks. I had checked for that but at first didn't find the one instance where
this occurred. Got it.
-Roy
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:18 PM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22.10.2020 23:15, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote:
>> Hi All:
>> I am working on a small bug fi
On 22.10.2020 23:15, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
wrote:
Hi All:
I am working on a small bug fix in a package, and on winbuilder_devel (not on
release) I get the following Note:
Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
URL: https://erddap.marine.ie/erddap (m
Hi All:
I am working on a small bug fix in a package, and on winbuilder_devel (not on
release) I get the following Note:
> Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
> URL: https://erddap.marine.ie/erddap (moved to
> https://erddap.marine.ie/erddap/)
> From: inst/doc/UsingrerddapXtrac
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a package and getting a
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about licenses
>> and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, which I can't figure out
>>
On 22/10/2020 12:56 p.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a package and
On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about licenses
> and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, which I can't figure out
> how to fix.
>
> My package imports flowCore, which has an Artistic-2
It’s necessary but not sufficient to use a licence from license.db
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 3:12 am, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes <
On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes
wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about licenses
and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, w
Hello:
With "R CMD check Ecdat_0.3-8.tar.gz" both locally (under macOS
10.15.7 with R 4.0.3) and with Travis (below), I'm getting "Warning:
large data files saved inefficiently: ... significantly better
compression could be obtained by using R CMD build --resave-data". This
is AFTER I d
On 22/10/2020 10:21 a.m., Kevin R. Coombes wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about
licenses and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, which I
can't figure out how to fix.
My package imports flowCore, which has an Artistic-2.0 license.
But flowCor
Hi,
I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about
licenses and ultimate dependencies on a restrictive license, which I
can't figure out how to fix.
My package imports flowCore, which has an Artistic-2.0 license.
But flowCore imports cytolib, which has a license from the
14 matches
Mail list logo
