Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN cannot find libraries on Windows

Hello Hervé, Thanks for confirming what I was thinking. Does anyone know how long it should take for win-builder to use the updated Rhtslib version? I just tried it again today, and it's still using the older version. Cheers, Lucas On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 11:34 PM Hervé Pagès wrote: > To me it

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: R CMD build hanging for some but not all packages

That was it; I had a big subdirectory full of stuff I was using to test the package. Removing it caused the build time to drop back to 15 seconds. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Gábor Csárdi Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2020 3:58 AM To: Hong Ooi Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org Subjec

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD build hanging for some but not all packages

Maybe you have large, ignored files in the package directory? R first creates a copy of the whole directory and only applies `.Rbuildignore` after that. Gabor On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 4:54 PM Hong Ooi via R-package-devel wrote: > > Actually, cancel that: it finished successfully, but took 3 minut

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD build hanging for some but not all packages

Actually, cancel that: it finished successfully, but took 3 minutes to prepare the package: r$> devtools::build() v checking for file 'C:\Users\hongo\Documents\GitHub\AzureStor/DESCRIPTION' - preparing 'AzureStor': (3m 4s) v checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... - installing the

[R-pkg-devel] R CMD build hanging for some but not all packages

This is with R 3.6.2 on Windows 10 Pro 1909. In the last couple of weeks, devtools::build() and devtools::check() have started hanging on some, but not all, of my packages. After some poking around, I discovered that it's actually R CMD build that is having problems, right after the "checking f

Re: [R-pkg-devel] translation .mo files

Dear Paul, Here's some information that I prepared for translators of the Rcmdr package, slightly edited to make it more generic. Perhaps you'll find it useful: R provides a general facility for translating messages from English to other languages using the GNU gettext translation tools

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CXX14 not defined on Windows

I had some success using RTools40 and the corresponding R testing version. I had to do a lot of MSYS shenanigans and couldn't get static compilation to work, but the binary package seems to work just fine in R 3.6.2. It makes me very happy to see that R will get an updated toolchain and a pro

Re: [R-pkg-devel] revdepcheck::revdep_check interpretation problem

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:24 AM Spencer Graves wrote: [...] > 1. What does the "E: 1" for "gamclass" mean? It sounds > like an error to me, but that contradicts the final message, > "OK: 16, BROKEN: 0". ✓ gamclass 0.58 ── E: 1 | W: 0 | N: 0 means t

Re: [R-pkg-devel] revdepcheck::revdep_check interpretation problem

El lun., 10 feb. 2020 9:24, Spencer Graves < spencer.gra...@effectivedefense.org> escribió: > Hello, All: > > >I just ran "revdepcheck::revdep_check" on my development version > of "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat";; copied below. It ended with > "OK: 16, BROKEN: 0". That sounds goo

[R-pkg-devel] revdepcheck::revdep_check interpretation problem

Hello, All:   I just ran "revdepcheck::revdep_check" on my development version of "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat";  copied below. It ended with "OK: 16, BROKEN: 0".  That sounds good, except that it also says "gamclass 0.58:  E: 1", so I'm confused.   Two questions: