Package karon is the problem. Is that package in your depends or imports?
Does that package use Depends?
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 8:24 am, wrote:
> In trying to develop a package to be submitted to CRAN, when I do Install
> and Reload or devtools::check(), I get the warning:
>
>
>
> Warning: replac
In your examples.
On February 4, 2020 5:53:08 PM PST, Marcelo Araya Salas
wrote:
>Hi all
>
>I got this error from CRAN tests:
>
>Warning: parse error in file 'Rraven-Ex.R':
>'\.' is an unrecognized escape in character string starting ""\."
>
>However, I can't find the original file where the err
Hi all
I got this error from CRAN tests:
Warning: parse error in file 'Rraven-Ex.R':
'\.' is an unrecognized escape in character string starting ""\."
However, I can't find the original file where the error is found. I have
try unsuccessfully for several hours :(
any suggestions on how to find
Thanks. I had seen this but it didn't register. I made this change to all
the potential conflicts (the packages ellipse and mgcv are never in an
@import statement), but I still get the conflict messages. John Karon
From: Max Turgeon
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 3:10 PM
To: sierras...@mi
I find it's well explained in the book by Hadley Wickham:
http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/namespace.html#imports
If package ellipse is in Imports (in your DESCRIPTION file), then
install.packages will make sure it's available on the user's system when
installing your own package. Therefore you can wri
Thanks Duncan. Please clarify: if I use ellipse::ellipse in code, do I need to
have @importFrom ellipse eliipse in the Roxygen code.
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Murdoch
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 2:45 PM
To: sierras...@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] function name co
On 04/02/2020 4:21 p.m., sierras...@mindspring.com wrote:
In trying to develop a package to be submitted to CRAN, when I do Install
and Reload or devtools::check(), I get the warning:
Warning: replacing previous import 'ellipse::pairs' by 'graphics::pairs'
when loading 'karon'
Warning: rep
In trying to develop a package to be submitted to CRAN, when I do Install
and Reload or devtools::check(), I get the warning:
Warning: replacing previous import 'ellipse::pairs' by 'graphics::pairs'
when loading 'karon'
Warning: replacing previous import 'MVN::mvn' by 'mgcv::mvn' when loading
The 00install.out file has this error message:
unable to load shared object
‘/srv/hornik/tmp/CRAN/BAREB.Rcheck/00LOCK-BAREB/00new/BAREB/libs/BAREB.so’:
/srv/hornik/tmp/CRAN/BAREB.Rcheck/00LOCK-BAREB/00new/BAREB/libs/BAREB.so:
undefined symbol: dpotrf_
That name dpotrf_ looks like something
Hi all,
I am trying to submit my R package to CRAN. However, I keep getting an error in
the second link, saying my package could not be installed. But the package
works perfectly fine in my personal computer. I would really appreciate it if
you could provide some possible solution.
Thanks in a
Thanks. And thanks for the tip.
-Roy
> On Feb 4, 2020, at 10:20 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2020 1:13 p.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>> Hi All:
>> I still get a little confused on what it means if a package is listed in
>> "Suggest" in my package
On 04/02/2020 1:13 p.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via
R-package-devel wrote:
Hi All:
I still get a little confused on what it means if a package is listed in "Suggest" in my package. I have been working
to try and keep dependencies down. One of my packages produces maps with data, and I
Hi All:
I still get a little confused on what it means if a package is listed in
"Suggest" in my package. I have been working to try and keep dependencies
down. One of my packages produces maps with data, and I have been asked if the
maps can be made interactive. It turns out this can be don
Thank you Gabor! I've posted an issue.
https://github.com/r-hub/rhub/issues/338
Thank you Bill! I think the solution for this may be simple. But I wanted
to make sure I could reproduce the warning so that I can validate that my
fix resolves the issue.
And thank you Uwe for all the work you do h
On 04.02.2020 18:21, William Dunlap wrote:
CRAN's check gives a warning
checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING
Documented arguments not in \usage in documentation object 'Process chromR
objects':
‘...’
and man/proc_chromR.Rd on github does list '...' in the \arguments section
but no fun
CRAN's check gives a warning
checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING
Documented arguments not in \usage in documentation object 'Process chromR
objects':
‘...’
and man/proc_chromR.Rd on github does list '...' in the \arguments section
but no function listed in the \usage section uses '...'.
T
On 4 February 2020 at 17:51, Guido Kraemer wrote:
| I am testing building a package on Windows. The package requires C++14.
You will have to wait.
The current Rtools is at g++ 4.9.3 which (barely) supports C++11. We all
keep our fingers crossed as the replacement Rtools would bring g++ 8.*.
This is the R-hub issue tracker:
https://github.com/r-hub/rhub/issues
Gabor
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:47 PM brian knaus wrote:
>
> Does anyone know the current status of r-hub? My package (
> https://github.com/knausb/vcfR) is throwing warnings on R-devel (
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks
I am testing building a package on Windows. The package requires C++14.
I have installed the latest versions of R (3.6.2), RTools (3.5), and
RStudio. The package builds fine under Linux.
I get the following error:
> devtools::install_github("gdkrmr/zarr-R")
...
C++14 standard reque
Does anyone know the current status of r-hub? My package (
https://github.com/knausb/vcfR) is throwing warnings on R-devel (
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_vcfR.html) and CRAN has
asked me to fix it. Tried r-hub but it failed.
https://builder.r-hub.io/status/vcfR_1.9.0.9000.ta
On 04/02/2020 9:15 a.m., Marcelo Araya Salas wrote:
Thanks
I found it here:
ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/archive/
not sure what that's suppose to mean
That generally means that it has been rejected. The usual sequence of
events is:
You submit it, and an email comes to the maintainer
On 4 February 2020 at 08:15, Marcelo Araya Salas wrote:
| I found it here:
|
| ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/archive/
|
| not sure what that's suppose to mean
"It's dead."
It generally means you will have gotten an email with the reasoning. But
whatever is in archive/ is no longer proces
Also a vote for the foghorn::cran_incoming() function.
"archive" means your package was rejected. If you don't know
why/didn't receive an e-mail, you might have to e-mail CRAN maintainers
for clarification.
• Hornik, Ligges and Zeileis. "Changes on CRAN: 2017-12-01 to
2018-06-30"
Thanks
I found it here:
ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/archive/
not sure what that's suppose to mean
Marcelo
El mar., 4 feb. 2020 a las 8:12, Dirk Eddelbuettel ()
escribió:
>
> On 4 February 2020 at 10:28, Helmut Schütz wrote:
> | Possibly it went unnoticed.
>
> A follow-up email may be a
On 4 February 2020 at 15:04, GD wrote:
| I have a very specific question regarding the licensing of my R package.
|
| Here is the details: I have an R package under the MIT license so the
| DESCRIPTION file contains the field `License: MIT + file LICENSE` and
| the LICENSE file contains the foll
On 4 February 2020 at 10:28, Helmut Schütz wrote:
| Possibly it went unnoticed.
A follow-up email may be a good idea.
| My first new package took two days from submission to acceptance
| including answering questions in July last year.
It is _much_ more clogged now as you can tell via a quick
Hi,
I have a very specific question regarding the licensing of my R package.
Here is the details: I have an R package under the MIT license so the
DESCRIPTION file contains the field `License: MIT + file LICENSE` and
the LICENSE file contains the following required fields:
```
YEAR:
COPYRIG
Hi Marcelo,
Marcelo Araya Salas wrote on 2020-02-04 00:56:
I submitted a new package to CRAN a couple of weeks ago. Does anyone know
how long does it take for the package to be processed? New package versions
are usually processed in a few hours so that's why I am wondering if
everything is fine
28 matches
Mail list logo
