Re: [R-pkg-devel] Manual inspection of a new CRAN submission

2019-12-18 Thread R. Mark Sharp
Mauricio, I appreciate the manual inspection. I am waiting for the second time on a manual inspection. The first inspection found a fairly severe error of mine where I was writting out an error file to the user’s home directory space. It was code I had written over two years ago and long befor

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Manual inspection of a new CRAN submission

2019-12-18 Thread Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini
Thank you very much Duncan for the information. BTW, it is incredible to me how the quality control of packages submitted to CRAN has improved in the last decade. Now the automatic procedures are able to identify even "little" things (e.g., broken links, misspelled words, size of vignettes, etc).

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Manual inspection of a new CRAN submission

2019-12-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 18/12/2019 5:01 p.m., Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote: Dear List, Today I submitted a package to CRAN, and after correcting some NOTEs, I got the following automatic message: "package mypackage_0.1-2.tar.gz has been auto-processed and is pending a manual inspection of this new CRAN submiss

[R-pkg-devel] Manual inspection of a new CRAN submission

2019-12-18 Thread Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini
Dear List, Today I submitted a package to CRAN, and after correcting some NOTEs, I got the following automatic message: "package mypackage_0.1-2.tar.gz has been auto-processed and is pending a manual inspection of this new CRAN submission. A CRAN team member will typically respond to you within t