Re: [R-pkg-devel] Linux Errors on RHub

2019-04-23 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
--- Begin Message --- Have already done that. Just to run a couple reasonable examples is taking 12 seconds. On my laptop from home it is more like 8 seconds, which if you put in the CRAN note with steps taken they will usually allow. Again, so I don't seem like I am criticizing CRAN, I fu

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Linux Errors on RHub

2019-04-23 Thread Steven Scott
The examples are dual purpose. They work like unit tests, and they show humans how the code works. If you have a separate unit testing section you can mock out the parts that take a long time (e.g. "get data from..."). Then just put the slow bits in your .Rd files into \dontrun blocks. On Tue, A

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Linux Errors on RHub

2019-04-23 Thread Steven Scott
Roy, I don't have an answer for you, but I have a similar issue. Does your code happen to have a C++ component that takes a long time to compile? On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:11 PM Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote: > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Roy

[R-pkg-devel] Linux Errors on RHub

2019-04-23 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
--- Begin Message --- Hi All: I am checking a package I am hoping to submit to CRAN on RHub. The Windows and Fedora runs worked but the Ubuntu test ended because of the following: > #> Warning messages: > 3203#> 1: In i.p(...) : installation of package ‘rgdal’ had non-zero exit > status > 3204

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: CRAN Debian File Handling Differences?

2019-04-23 Thread David Blodgett via R-package-devel
--- Begin Message --- I see. Thank you for the clarification. I did not realize this applied to testing as well as package functionality. > On Apr 23, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 17:24, David Blodgett wrote: >> >> OK. Thank you. I'm always nervous about clo

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: CRAN Debian File Handling Differences?

2019-04-23 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 17:24, David Blodgett wrote: > > OK. Thank you. I'm always nervous about closing and re-opening a tempfile() > but I suppose it is safe. > > Should I interpret your response as saying that creating and mutating files > in "tests/testthat/data" is not possible on CRAN? >Fr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: CRAN Debian File Handling Differences?

2019-04-23 Thread David Blodgett via R-package-devel
--- Begin Message --- OK. Thank you. I'm always nervous about closing and re-opening a tempfile() but I suppose it is safe. Should I interpret your response as saying that creating and mutating files in "tests/testthat/data" is not possible on CRAN? Thank you, - Dave > On Apr 23, 2019, at 10:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN Debian File Handling Differences?

2019-04-23 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 15:57, David Blodgett via R-package-devel wrote: > > I'm working on some CRAN Debian test failures > (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ncdfgeom_1.0.0_20190423_031452/). > The tests all pass on rhub Debian, CRAN windows, local OSX, and Travis > Ubuntu. Th

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN Debian File Handling Differences?

2019-04-23 Thread David Blodgett via R-package-devel
--- Begin Message --- Dear R Package Development Community, I'm working on some CRAN Debian test failures (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ncdfgeom_1.0.0_20190423_031452/). The tests all pass on rhub Debian, CRAN windows, local OSX, and Travis Ubuntu. The tests that are faili