Only for packages which show problems in these checks, the problems are
linked from the CRAN package check summary page.
Best,
Uwe
On 21.09.2018 20:48, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
We noticed,
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_issue_kinds.html
Are test results from alternative BLAS/LA
We noticed,
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_issue_kinds.html
Are test results from alternative BLAS/LAPACK implementations available
somewhere?
--
Joshua N. Pritikin, Ph.D.
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics
Virginia Commonwealth University
PO Box 980126
800
Hi,
the NOTEs show that your examples require to much CPU time.
Solution: reduce CPU time of your examples by increasing efficiency of
your code, by simplification of the examples (e.g. with smaller samples
or toy data), or, if nothing else helps, by embracing examples with
\dontrun{} or \don
I've just spent a couple of days tracking down a bug in rgl. The
symptoms were that when the X11 display was unavailable, S3 methods from
a package that used rgl failed to show up.
Specifically,
library(nat)
methods("plot3d")
would only show the rgl methods, not the ones that nat added.
The
Hi Rhys,
the notes are quite clear: your examples are running too long. That's
easily avoided by using smaller data or limiting the amount of
non-necessary operations in the examples. For the rest is looks OK to me.
Best thing you can do now is fix the examples so they don't run as long,
and resu
Hi,
received the below email about uploading a package, but I'm not sure how to
solve these problems.
Thanks
Rhys
Dear maintainer,
package SitesInterest_1.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: <
https://win-builder.r-project.or
